These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


1121 related items for PubMed ID: 21846981

  • 1. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
    Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Matusiak M, Porowski M, Skarzynski PH, James CJ.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim straight electrode in subjects with residual low-frequency hearing.
    Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Matusiak M, Porowski M, Skarzynski PH, James CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):e33-43. PubMed ID: 24556970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.
    Fraysse B, Macías AR, Sterkers O, Burdo S, Ramsden R, Deguine O, Klenzner T, Lenarz T, Rodriguez MM, Von Wallenberg E, James C.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode.
    Cosetti MK, Friedmann DR, Zhu BZ, Heman-Ackah SE, Fang Y, Keller RG, Shapiro WH, Roland JT, Waltzman SB.
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 23449440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T, Fastl H, Baumann U.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Apr; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cochlear implantation: is hearing preservation necessary in severe to profound hearing loss?
    Derinsu U, Serin GM, Akdaş F, Batman Ç.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):520-2. PubMed ID: 21403538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The role of preoperative, intratympanic glucocorticoids for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation: a prospective clinical study.
    Rajan GP, Kuthubutheen J, Hedne N, Krishnaswamy J.
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Jan; 122(1):190-5. PubMed ID: 22183635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA, Black JM, Koch DB.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Hearing conservation surgery using the Hybrid-L electrode. Results from the first clinical trial at the Medical University of Hannover.
    Lenarz T, Stöver T, Buechner A, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Patrick J, Pesch J.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009 Aug; 14 Suppl 1():22-31. PubMed ID: 19390172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Combined electroacoustic stimulation in conventional candidates for cochlear implantation.
    James CJ, Fraysse B, Deguine O, Lenarz T, Mawman D, Ramos A, Ramsden R, Sterkers O.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006 Aug; 11 Suppl 1():57-62. PubMed ID: 17063012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation.
    Balkany TJ, Connell SS, Hodges AV, Payne SL, Telischi FF, Eshraghi AA, Angeli SI, Germani R, Messiah S, Arheart KL.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1083-8. PubMed ID: 17130798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants.
    Kim JS, Kim LS, Jeong SW.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant.
    Lenarz T, James C, Cuda D, Fitzgerald O'Connor A, Frachet B, Frijns JH, Klenzner T, Laszig R, Manrique M, Marx M, Merkus P, Mylanus EA, Offeciers E, Pesch J, Ramos-Macias A, Robier A, Sterkers O, Uziel A.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):838-48. PubMed ID: 23992489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The role of hearing preservation on electrical thresholds and speech performances in cochlear implantation.
    D'Elia A, Bartoli R, Giagnotti F, Quaranta N.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):343-7. PubMed ID: 22388729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Hearing preservation after complete cochlear coverage in cochlear implantation with the free-fitting FLEXSOFT electrode carrier.
    Helbig S, Baumann U, Hey C, Helbig M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Aug; 32(6):973-9. PubMed ID: 21730882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
    Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, Lowder MW.
    Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
    Büchner A, Schüssler M, Battmer RD, Stöver T, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Lenarz T.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009 May; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J, Baker S, Caraway T, Kasulis H, Mears A, Smith J, Swim L, Wood M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
    Wolfe J, Parkinson A, Schafer EC, Gilden J, Rehwinkel K, Mansanares J, Coughlan E, Wright J, Torres J, Gannaway S.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 57.