These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

372 related items for PubMed ID: 21877812

  • 1. The influence of spectral characteristics of early reflections on speech intelligibility.
    Arweiler I, Buchholz JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):996-1005. PubMed ID: 21877812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The influence of masker type on early reflection processing and speech intelligibility (L).
    Arweiler I, Buchholz JM, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 23297878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T, Laugesen S, Jensen NS, Kragelund L.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The binaural intelligibility level difference in hearing-impaired listeners: the role of supra-threshold deficits.
    Goverts ST, Houtgast T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3073-84. PubMed ID: 21117756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The Danish hearing in noise test.
    Nielsen JB, Dau T.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 21319937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
    Francart T, van Wieringen A, Wouters J.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: steady-state noise.
    Smits C, Festen JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2987-98. PubMed ID: 22087927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
    Chen F, Wong LL, Tahmina Q, Azimi B, Hu Y.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Revision, extension, and evaluation of a binaural speech intelligibility model.
    Beutelmann R, Brand T, Kollmeier B.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2479-97. PubMed ID: 20370031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Speech understanding in noise with an eyeglass hearing aid: asymmetric fitting and the head shadow benefit of anterior microphones.
    Mens LH.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21047292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of reverberation and masker fluctuations on binaural unmasking of speech.
    George EL, Festen JM, Goverts ST.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1581-91. PubMed ID: 22978887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Intelligibility of reverberant noisy speech with ideal binary masking.
    Roman N, Woodruff J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2153-61. PubMed ID: 21973369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.
    Christiansen C, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1655-66. PubMed ID: 22978894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effects of spatial and temporal integration of a single early reflection on speech intelligibility.
    Warzybok A, Rennies J, Brand T, Doclo S, Kollmeier B.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):269-82. PubMed ID: 23297901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times.
    Baer T, Moore BC, Gatehouse S.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993 May; 30(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 8263829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Prediction of the influence of reverberation on binaural speech intelligibility in noise and in quiet.
    Rennies J, Brand T, Kollmeier B.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 22087928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
    Collin B, Lavandier M.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.
    Qazi OU, van Dijk B, Moonen M, Wouters J.
    Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():79-87. PubMed ID: 23396271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
    Wang D, Kjems U, Pedersen MS, Boldt JB, Lunner T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.