These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


274 related items for PubMed ID: 21878379

  • 41. Alpha9alpha10 knockout mice show altered physiological and behavioral responses to signals in masking noise.
    Mondul JA, Burke K, Morley B, Lauer AM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 May 01; 155(5):3183-3194. PubMed ID: 38738939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Spatial and temporal disparity in signals and maskers affects signal detection in non-human primates.
    Rocchi F, Dylla ME, Bohlen PA, Ramachandran R.
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb 01; 344():1-12. PubMed ID: 27770624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and the middle-ear muscle reflex in human ears.
    Sun XM.
    Hear Res; 2008 Mar 01; 237(1-2):66-75. PubMed ID: 18258398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips.
    Wagner W, Heppelmann G, Müller J, Janssen T, Zenner HP.
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan 01; 223(1-2):83-92. PubMed ID: 17137736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Olivocochlear efferents: Their action, effects, measurement and uses, and the impact of the new conception of cochlear mechanical responses.
    Guinan JJ.
    Hear Res; 2018 May 01; 362():38-47. PubMed ID: 29291948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Right-ear advantage drives the link between olivocochlear efferent 'antimasking' and speech-in-noise listening benefits.
    Bidelman GM, Bhagat SP.
    Neuroreport; 2015 May 27; 26(8):483-7. PubMed ID: 25919996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. The relationship between precursor level and the temporal effect.
    Strickland EA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb 27; 123(2):946-54. PubMed ID: 18247897
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Intensity discrimination in the presence of random-frequency, multicomponent maskers and broadband noise.
    Neff DL, Jesteadt W.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct 27; 100(4 Pt 1):2289-98. PubMed ID: 8865636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Effect of broadband and narrowband contralateral noise on psychophysical tuning curves and otoacoustic emissions.
    Wicher A, Moore BC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 May 27; 135(5):2931-41. PubMed ID: 24815273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Frequency specificity and left-ear advantage of medial olivocochlear efferent modulation: a study based on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission.
    Xing D, Gong Q.
    Neuroreport; 2017 Sep 06; 28(13):775-778. PubMed ID: 28538522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Masked detection and discrimination of tone sequences under conditions of monaural and binaural masking release.
    Hall JW, Buss E, Grose JH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar 06; 129(3):1482-9. PubMed ID: 21428512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. The effect of a precursor on growth of forward masking.
    Krull V, Strickland EA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun 06; 123(6):4352-7. PubMed ID: 18537386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. The effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Zhao W, Dhar S.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar 06; 11(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 19798532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.