These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

343 related items for PubMed ID: 21895730

  • 1. Comparison of disc diffusion, Etest and agar dilution for susceptibility testing of colistin against Enterobacteriaceae.
    Maalej SM, Meziou MR, Rhimi FM, Hammami A.
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2011 Nov; 53(5):546-51. PubMed ID: 21895730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Colistin susceptibility testing by Etest and disk diffusion methods.
    Galani I, Kontopidou F, Souli M, Rekatsina PD, Koratzanis E, Deliolanis J, Giamarellou H.
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2008 May; 31(5):434-9. PubMed ID: 18328674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of colistin stability in agar and comparison of four methods for MIC testing of colistin.
    Turlej-Rogacka A, Xavier BB, Janssens L, Lammens C, Zarkotou O, Pournaras S, Goossens H, Malhotra-Kumar S.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2018 Feb; 37(2):345-353. PubMed ID: 29177612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparative evaluation of the VITEK 2, disk diffusion, etest, broth microdilution, and agar dilution susceptibility testing methods for colistin in clinical isolates, including heteroresistant Enterobacter cloacae and Acinetobacter baumannii strains.
    Lo-Ten-Foe JR, de Smet AM, Diederen BM, Kluytmans JA, van Keulen PH.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2007 Oct; 51(10):3726-30. PubMed ID: 17646414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of Etest, Vitek and agar dilution for susceptibility testing of colistin.
    Tan TY, Ng SY.
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2007 May; 13(5):541-4. PubMed ID: 17371537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of three standardized disc susceptibility testing methods for colistin.
    Tan TY, Ng LS.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2006 Oct; 58(4):864-7. PubMed ID: 16905528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Polymyxin B Etest® compared with gold-standard broth microdilution in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae exhibiting a wide range of polymyxin B MICs.
    Kulengowski B, Ribes JA, Burgess DS.
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2019 Jan; 25(1):92-95. PubMed ID: 29674129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of disc diffusion, Etest and broth microdilution for testing susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa to polymyxins.
    van der Heijden IM, Levin AS, De Pedri EH, Fung L, Rossi F, Duboc G, Barone AA, Costa SF.
    Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob; 2007 Aug 15; 6():8. PubMed ID: 17697363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. An Improved Medium for Colistin Susceptibility Testing.
    Gwozdzinski K, Azarderakhsh S, Imirzalioglu C, Falgenhauer L, Chakraborty T.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2018 May 15; 56(5):. PubMed ID: 29514937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Susceptibility of ESBL Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae to fosfomycin in the Netherlands and comparison of several testing methods including Etest, MIC test strip, Vitek2, Phoenix and disc diffusion.
    van den Bijllaardt W, Schijffelen MJ, Bosboom RW, Cohen Stuart J, Diederen B, Kampinga G, Le TN, Overdevest I, Stals F, Voorn P, Waar K, Mouton JW, Muller AE.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2018 Sep 01; 73(9):2380-2387. PubMed ID: 29982660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Relationship between the distribution of cefepime minimum inhibitory concentrations and detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase production among clinically important Enterobacteriaceae isolates obtained from patients in intensive care units in Taiwan: results from the Surveillance of Multicenter Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan (SMART) in 2007.
    Jean SS, Lee WS, Bai KJ, Lam C, Hsu CW, Yu KW, Liao CH, Chang FY, Ko WC, Wu JJ, Chen YH, Chen YS, Liu JW, Lu MC, Liu CY, Chen RJ, Hsueh PR.
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2015 Feb 01; 48(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 23973410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates in Pakistan by Etest compared to Calibrated Dichotomous Sensitivity and Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute disc diffusion techniques.
    Mal PB, Jabeen K, Farooqi J, Unemo M, Khan E.
    BMC Microbiol; 2016 Oct 10; 16(1):236. PubMed ID: 27724873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of the Etest method for detecting colistin susceptibility of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative isolates in Vietnam.
    Nhung PH, Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Phuong DM, Shimada K, Anh NQ, Binh NG, Thanh do V, Ohmagari N, Kirikae T.
    J Infect Chemother; 2015 Aug 10; 21(8):617-9. PubMed ID: 25960156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Colistin and Polymyxin B Susceptibility Testing for Carbapenem-Resistant and mcr-Positive Enterobacteriaceae: Comparison of Sensititre, MicroScan, Vitek 2, and Etest with Broth Microdilution.
    Chew KL, La MV, Lin RTP, Teo JWP.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2017 Sep 10; 55(9):2609-2616. PubMed ID: 28592552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Performance of the EUCAST disc diffusion method and two MIC methods in detection of Enterobacteriaceae with reduced susceptibility to meropenem: the NordicAST CPE study.
    Haldorsen B, Giske CG, Hansen DS, Helgason KO, Kahlmeter G, Löhr IH, Matuschek E, Österblad M, Rantakokko-Jalava K, Wang M, Småbrekke L, Samuelsen Ø, Sundsfjord A, NordicAST CPE Study Group.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2018 Oct 01; 73(10):2738-2747. PubMed ID: 30053113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparative assessment of antimicrobial susceptibility testing for tigecycline and colistin against Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates, including multidrug-resistant isolates.
    Piewngam P, Kiratisin P.
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2014 Nov 01; 44(5):396-401. PubMed ID: 25442358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Revisiting colistin susceptibility testing: will adding calcium to Mueller-Hinton agar improve the detection of colistin resistance?
    Matuschek E, Brolund A, Karlsson Lindsjö O, Giske CG, Byfors S, Kahlmeter G.
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2021 Aug 01; 27(8):1172.e1-1172.e5. PubMed ID: 33901665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Validation of novel cost-effective antimicrobial gradient strips for the determination of carbapenem susceptibility in Enterobacteriaceae.
    Sekar R, Srivani S, Lallitha S, Thenmozhi P, Devisri T, Amudhan M, Mythreyee M.
    J Glob Antimicrob Resist; 2017 Mar 01; 8():97-101. PubMed ID: 28024980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Activity of temocillin and 15 other agents, including fosfomycin and colistin, against Enterobacteriaceae in Hong Kong.
    Ip M, Lai CK, Fung KSC, Wong KT, Zhu C, Van de Velde S, Tsang DN, Hawkey P.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2017 Dec 01; 36(12):2491-2494. PubMed ID: 28840351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Multicenter Evaluation of Colistin Broth Disk Elution and Colistin Agar Test: a Report from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
    Humphries RM, Green DA, Schuetz AN, Bergman Y, Lewis S, Yee R, Stump S, Lopez M, Macesic N, Uhlemann AC, Kohner P, Cole N, Simner PJ.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2019 Nov 01; 57(11):. PubMed ID: 31511331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.