These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Effect of corneal stiffening on Goldmann applanation tonometry and Tono-Pen measurements in canine eyes. Tang J, Pan X, Weber PA, Liu J. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Mar 15; 53(3):1397-405. PubMed ID: 22297494 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Scleral Tono-Pen Intraocular Pressure Measurements with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Badakere SV, Choudhari NS, Rao HL, Chary CR, Garudadri CS, Senthil S. Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb 15; 95(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 29370020 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Tono-Pen versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: A Comparison of 898 Eyes. Bao B, Diaconita V, Schulz DC, Hutnik C. Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2019 Feb 15; 2(6):435-439. PubMed ID: 32672578 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of corneal edema on intraocular pressure measurements using goldmann applanation tonometry, Tono-Pen XL, iCare, and ORA: an in vitro model. Neuburger M, Maier P, Böhringer D, Reinhard T, F Jordan J. J Glaucoma; 2013 Sep 15; 22(7):584-90. PubMed ID: 22366704 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Tonnu PA, Ho T, Newson T, El Sheikh A, Sharma K, White E, Bunce C, Garway-Heath D. Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul 15; 89(7):851-4. PubMed ID: 15965165 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Variations of Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Tono-Pen, iCare Rebound Tonometer, and Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometer in Patients With Corneal Edema After Phacoemulsification. Kiddee W, Tanjana A. J Glaucoma; 2021 Apr 01; 30(4):317-324. PubMed ID: 33137014 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Tono-Pen versus Goldmann tonometry after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Levy Y, Zadok D, Glovinsky Y, Krakowski D, Nemet P. J Cataract Refract Surg; 1999 Apr 01; 25(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 10198852 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two handheld applanation tonometers and the association of central corneal thickness, age, and intraocular pressure in normal and diseased canine eyes. Kato K. Vet Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov 01; 17(6):417-25. PubMed ID: 24517734 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The difference in intraocular pressure readings between 3 applanation tonometers is independent of central corneal thickness, in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes. Baily C, Dooley I, Collins N, Hickey-Dwyer M. J Glaucoma; 2014 Dec 01; 23(9):620-3. PubMed ID: 23429625 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the iCare, Tono-Pen, non-contact airpuff, and Goldmann applanation tonometers in eyes with corneal edema after penetrating keratoplasty. Yeh SJ, Chen KH, Kuang TM, Liu CJ, Chen MJ. J Chin Med Assoc; 2021 Mar 01; 84(3):320-325. PubMed ID: 33587519 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparisons of intraocular pressure measurements: Goldmann applanation tonometry, noncontact tonometry, Tono-Pen tonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry. Hsu SY, Sheu MM, Hsu AH, Wu KY, Yeh JI, Tien JN, Tsai RK. Eye (Lond); 2009 Jul 01; 23(7):1582-8. PubMed ID: 19407845 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, and Tono-Pen XL in edematous corneas. Kontadakis GA, Pennos A, Pentari I, Kymionis GD, Pallikaris IG, Ginis H. Ther Adv Ophthalmol; 2020 Jul 01; 12():2515841420923190. PubMed ID: 32577607 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability. Tonnu PA, Ho T, Sharma K, White E, Bunce C, Garway-Heath D. Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul 01; 89(7):847-50. PubMed ID: 15965164 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]