These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

293 related items for PubMed ID: 21911279

  • 1. Difficult airway management in the emergency department: GlideScope videolaryngoscopy compared to direct laryngoscopy.
    Mosier JM, Stolz U, Chiu S, Sakles JC.
    J Emerg Med; 2012 Jun; 42(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 21911279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Tracheal intubation in the emergency department: a comparison of GlideScope® video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy in 822 intubations.
    Sakles JC, Mosier JM, Chiu S, Keim SM.
    J Emerg Med; 2012 Apr; 42(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 21689899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Learning curves for direct laryngoscopy and GlideScope® video laryngoscopy in an emergency medicine residency.
    Sakles JC, Mosier J, Patanwala AE, Dicken J.
    West J Emerg Med; 2014 Nov; 15(7):930-7. PubMed ID: 25493156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparing the novel GlideScope Groove videolaryngoscope with conventional videolaryngoscopy: a randomized mannequin study of novice providers.
    Tung A, Griesdale DE.
    J Clin Anesth; 2013 Dec; 25(8):644-50. PubMed ID: 24095892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with direct laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation in an emergency department: A randomised clinical trial.
    Sulser S, Ubmann D, Schlaepfer M, Brueesch M, Goliasch G, Seifert B, Spahn DR, Ruetzler K.
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2016 Dec; 33(12):943-948. PubMed ID: 27533711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of the Storz CMAC®, Glidescope® GVL, AirTraq®, King LTS-D™, and direct laryngoscopy in a simulated difficult airway.
    Nelson JG, Wewerka SS, Woster CM, Burnett AM, Salzman JG, Frascone RJ.
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Mar; 31(3):589-92. PubMed ID: 23347722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparative trial of the GlideScope(R) video laryngoscope to direct laryngoscope in children with difficult direct laryngoscopy and an evaluation of the effect of blade size.
    Lee JH, Park YH, Byon HJ, Han WK, Kim HS, Kim CS, Kim JT.
    Anesth Analg; 2013 Jul; 117(1):176-81. PubMed ID: 23687227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Predictors of difficult videolaryngoscopy with GlideScope® or C-MAC® with D-blade: secondary analysis from a large comparative videolaryngoscopy trial.
    Aziz MF, Bayman EO, Van Tienderen MM, Todd MM, StAGE Investigator Group, Brambrink AM.
    Br J Anaesth; 2016 Jul; 117(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 27317711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.