These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
495 related items for PubMed ID: 21914986
1. Clinical blood pressure measurement verification when comparing a Tensoval duo control device with a mercury sphygmomanometer in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation. Farsky S, Benova K, Krausova D, Sirotiaková J, Vysocanova P. Blood Press Monit; 2011 Oct; 16(5):252-7. PubMed ID: 21914986 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients. Lodi CA, Estridge C, Ghidini C. Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy assessment of a novel blood pressure measurement device in a South African adult population: Tensoval duo control. de Greeff A, Hezelgrave N, Shennan AH. Blood Press Monit; 2011 Dec; 16(6):304-6. PubMed ID: 22027814 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace. Elliott WJ, Young PE, DeVivo L, Feldstein J, Black HR. Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the Artsana CSI 610 automated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. Pini C, Pastori M, Baccheschi J, Omboni S, Parati G, European Society of Hypertension. Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 17496468 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The accuracy of automated blood pressure measuring devices in patients with controlled atrial fibrillation. Stewart MJ, Gough K, Padfield PL. J Hypertens; 1995 Mar; 13(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 7622850 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs. Neuhauser HK, Ellert U, Thamm M, Adler C. Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the Artsana CS 410 automated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. Pini C, Natalizi A, Gerosa PF, Frigerio M, Omboni S, Parati G. Blood Press Monit; 2008 Jun; 13(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 18496297 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device. Pavan MV, Saura GE, Korkes HA, Nascimento KM, Madeira Neto ND, Dávila R, Rodrigues CI, Almeida FA. J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the HEM-780REL with easy wrap cuff for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. Viera AJ, Hinderliter AL. Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):335-8. PubMed ID: 17890973 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of blood pressure measurements between an automated oscillometric device and a Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer in the northern Sweden MONICA study. Eriksson M, Carlberg B, Jansson JH. Blood Press Monit; 2012 Aug; 17(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 22781634 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]