These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


2287 related items for PubMed ID: 21919503

  • 21. Three-dimensional structure of the complex between acyl-coenzyme A binding protein and palmitoyl-coenzyme A.
    Kragelund BB, Andersen KV, Madsen JC, Knudsen J, Poulsen FM.
    J Mol Biol; 1993 Apr 20; 230(4):1260-77. PubMed ID: 8503960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. CREDO: a protein-ligand interaction database for drug discovery.
    Schreyer A, Blundell T.
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2009 Feb 20; 73(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 19207418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Structural parameterization of the binding enthalpy of small ligands.
    Luque I, Freire E.
    Proteins; 2002 Nov 01; 49(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 12210999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. A hybrid clustering of protein binding sites.
    Iván G, Szabadka Z, Grolmusz V.
    FEBS J; 2010 Mar 01; 277(6):1494-502. PubMed ID: 20148971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Molecular fields in ligand discovery.
    Gane PJ, Chan AW.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013 Mar 01; 1008():479-99. PubMed ID: 23729264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. N-H...O, O-H...O, and C-H...O hydrogen bonds in protein-ligand complexes: strong and weak interactions in molecular recognition.
    Sarkhel S, Desiraju GR.
    Proteins; 2004 Feb 01; 54(2):247-59. PubMed ID: 14696187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The structure of glutamine-binding protein complexed with glutamine at 1.94 A resolution: comparisons with other amino acid binding proteins.
    Sun YJ, Rose J, Wang BC, Hsiao CD.
    J Mol Biol; 1998 Apr 24; 278(1):219-29. PubMed ID: 9571045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Computational approaches to identifying and characterizing protein binding sites for ligand design.
    Henrich S, Salo-Ahen OM, Huang B, Rippmann FF, Cruciani G, Wade RC.
    J Mol Recognit; 2010 Apr 24; 23(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 19746440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Structural interaction fingerprint (SIFt): a novel method for analyzing three-dimensional protein-ligand binding interactions.
    Deng Z, Chuaqui C, Singh J.
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jan 15; 47(2):337-44. PubMed ID: 14711306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Generalized modeling of enzyme-ligand interactions using proteochemometrics and local protein substructures.
    Strömbergsson H, Kryshtafovych A, Prusis P, Fidelis K, Wikberg JE, Komorowski J, Hvidsten TR.
    Proteins; 2006 Nov 15; 65(3):568-79. PubMed ID: 16948162
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Geometric and chemical patterns of interaction in protein--ligand complexes and their application in docking.
    Moreno E, León K.
    Proteins; 2002 Apr 01; 47(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11870860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Detection of 3D atomic similarities and their use in the discrimination of small molecule protein-binding sites.
    Najmanovich R, Kurbatova N, Thornton J.
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug 15; 24(16):i105-11. PubMed ID: 18689810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. NMR investigations of protein-carbohydrate interactions: studies on the relevance of Trp/Tyr variations in lectin binding sites as deduced from titration microcalorimetry and NMR studies on hevein domains. Determination of the NMR structure of the complex between pseudohevein and N,N',N"-triacetylchitotriose.
    Asensio JL, Siebert HC, von Der Lieth CW, Laynez J, Bruix M, Soedjanaamadja UM, Beintema JJ, Cañada FJ, Gabius HJ, Jiménez-Barbero J.
    Proteins; 2000 Aug 01; 40(2):218-36. PubMed ID: 10842338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The automatic search for ligand binding sites in proteins of known three-dimensional structure using only geometric criteria.
    Peters KP, Fauck J, Frömmel C.
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Feb 16; 256(1):201-13. PubMed ID: 8609611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Protein side-chain rearrangement in regions of point mutations.
    Eyal E, Najmanovich R, Edelman M, Sobolev V.
    Proteins; 2003 Feb 01; 50(2):272-82. PubMed ID: 12486721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Predicting the accuracy of ligand overlay methods with Random Forest models.
    Nandigam RK, Evans DA, Erickson JA, Kim S, Sutherland JJ.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec 01; 48(12):2386-94. PubMed ID: 19053524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Analysis and optimization of structure-based virtual screening protocols (1): exploration of ligand conformational sampling techniques.
    Good AC, Cheney DL.
    J Mol Graph Model; 2003 Sep 01; 22(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 12798388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. PDB-Ligand: a ligand database based on PDB for the automated and customized classification of ligand-binding structures.
    Shin JM, Cho DH.
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2005 Jan 01; 33(Database issue):D238-41. PubMed ID: 15608186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Similarity metrics for ligands reflecting the similarity of the target proteins.
    Schuffenhauer A, Floersheim P, Acklin P, Jacoby E.
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003 Jan 01; 43(2):391-405. PubMed ID: 12653501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Predicting druggable binding sites at the protein-protein interface.
    Fuller JC, Burgoyne NJ, Jackson RM.
    Drug Discov Today; 2009 Feb 01; 14(3-4):155-61. PubMed ID: 19041415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 115.