These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
123 related items for PubMed ID: 21951766
1. Effective population size of natural populations of Drosophila buzzatii, with a comparative evaluation of nine methods of estimation. Barker JS. Mol Ecol; 2011 Nov; 20(21):4452-71. PubMed ID: 21951766 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative estimation of effective population sizes and temporal gene flow in two contrasting population systems. Fraser DJ, Hansen MM, Ostergaard S, Tessier N, Legault M, Bernatchez L. Mol Ecol; 2007 Sep; 16(18):3866-89. PubMed ID: 17850551 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bottlenecks, population differentiation and apparent selection at microsatellite loci in Australian Drosophila buzzatii. Barker JS, Frydenberg J, González J, Davies HI, Ruiz A, Sørensen JG, Loeschcke V. Heredity (Edinb); 2009 Apr; 102(4):389-401. PubMed ID: 19142202 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: to what time periods do the estimates apply? Waples RS. Mol Ecol; 2005 Oct; 14(11):3335-52. PubMed ID: 16156807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Usefulness of molecular-based methods for estimating effective population size in livestock assessed using data from the endangered black-coated Asturcón pony. Goyache F, Alvarez I, Fernández I, Pérez-Pardal L, Royo LJ, Lorenzo L. J Anim Sci; 2011 May; 89(5):1251-9. PubMed ID: 21257782 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Monitoring the effective population size of a brown bear (Ursus arctos) population using new single-sample approaches. Skrbinšek T, Jelenčič M, Waits L, Kos I, Jerina K, Trontelj P. Mol Ecol; 2012 Feb; 21(4):862-75. PubMed ID: 22229706 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A potential bias in the temporal method for estimating Ne in admixed populations under natural selection. Araki H, Waples RS, Blouin MS. Mol Ecol; 2007 Jun; 16(11):2261-71. PubMed ID: 17561889 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Understanding and estimating effective population size for practical application in marine species management. Hare MP, Nunney L, Schwartz MK, Ruzzante DE, Burford M, Waples RS, Ruegg K, Palstra F. Conserv Biol; 2011 Jun; 25(3):438-49. PubMed ID: 21284731 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative analyses of effective population size within and among species: ranid frogs as a case study. Phillipsen IC, Funk WC, Hoffman EA, Monsen KJ, Blouin MS. Evolution; 2011 Oct; 65(10):2927-45. PubMed ID: 21967433 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effective population sizes and migration rates in fragmented populations of an endangered insect (Coenagrion mercuriale: Odonata). Watts PC, Saccheri IJ, Kemp SJ, Thompson DJ. J Anim Ecol; 2007 Jul; 76(4):790-800. PubMed ID: 17584385 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Population biology of the invasive freshwater snail Physa acuta approached through genetic markers, ecological characterization and demography. Bousset L, Henry PY, Sourrouille P, Jarne P. Mol Ecol; 2004 Jul; 13(7):2023-36. PubMed ID: 15189223 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic effective size, N(e), tracks density in a small freshwater cyprinid, Pecos bluntnose shiner (Notropis simus pecosensis). Osborne MJ, Davenport SR, Hoagstrom CW, Turner TF. Mol Ecol; 2010 Jul; 19(14):2832-44. PubMed ID: 20579288 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Linked vs unlinked markers: multilocus microsatellite haplotype-sharing as a tool to estimate gene flow and introgression. Koopman WJ, Li Y, Coart E, van de Weg WE, Vosman B, Roldán-Ruiz I, Smulders MJ. Mol Ecol; 2007 Jan; 16(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17217342 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]