These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1805 related items for PubMed ID: 21962034

  • 1. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Shau D, Adogwa O, Cheng JS, Anderson WN, Devin CJ, McGirt MJ.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis.
    Parker SL, Adogwa O, Mendenhall SK, Shau DN, Anderson WN, Cheng JS, Devin CJ, McGirt MJ.
    Spine J; 2012 Dec; 12(12):1122-8. PubMed ID: 23158968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Parker SL, Adogwa O, Paul AR, Anderson WN, Aaronson O, Cheng JS, McGirt MJ.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
    Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Shau DN, Adogwa O, Anderson WN, Devin CJ, McGirt MJ.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
    Parker SL, Godil SS, Shau DN, Mendenhall SK, McGirt MJ.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23176164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY.
    Spine J; 2008 Feb; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Asher AL, Kerezoudis P, Mummaneni PV, Bisson EF, Glassman SD, Foley KT, Slotkin JR, Potts EA, Shaffrey ME, Shaffrey CI, Coric D, Knightly JJ, Park P, Fu KM, Devin CJ, Archer KR, Chotai S, Chan AK, Virk MS, Bydon M.
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H, Maekawa S, Hamada Y.
    Spine J; 2008 Jan; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.
    Adogwa O, Parker SL, Shau DN, Mendenhall SK, Aaronson OS, Cheng JS, Devin CJ, McGirt MJ.
    Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 21937282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Assessment of spine surgery outcomes: inconsistency of change amongst outcome measurements.
    Copay AG, Martin MM, Subach BR, Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Schuler TC, Berven S.
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 20171937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Laminectomy and extension of instrumented fusion improves 2-year pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with adjacent segment disease: defining the long-term effectiveness of surgery.
    Adogwa O, Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Shau DN, Aaronson O, Cheng J, Devin CJ, McGirt MJ.
    World Neurosurg; 2013 Dec; 80(6):893-6. PubMed ID: 22381277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Preoperative Zung depression scale predicts patient satisfaction independent of the extent of improvement after revision lumbar surgery.
    Adogwa O, Parker SL, Shau DN, Mendenhall SK, Bydon A, Cheng JS, Asher AL, McGirt MJ.
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 23422730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
    Adogwa O, Carr RK, Kudyba K, Karikari I, Bagley CA, Gokaslan ZL, Theodore N, Cheng JS.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
    Glassman SD, Carreon LY, Djurasovic M, Dimar JR, Johnson JR, Puno RM, Campbell MJ.
    Spine J; 2009 Feb; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 18805059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Determination of the minimum improvement in pain, disability, and health state associated with cost-effectiveness: introduction of the concept of minimum cost-effective difference.
    Parker SL, McGirt MJ.
    Neurosurgery; 2012 Dec; 71(6):1149-55. PubMed ID: 22986596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Usefulness of minimum clinically important difference for assessing patients with subaxial degenerative cervical spine disease: statistical versus substantial clinical benefit.
    Auffinger B, Lam S, Shen J, Thaci B, Roitberg BZ.
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2013 Dec; 155(12):2345-54; discussion 2355. PubMed ID: 24136679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion.
    Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Campbell MJ, Anderson PA.
    Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20359958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
    Adogwa O, Elsamadicy AA, Han JL, Cheng J, Karikari I, Bagley CA.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of multilevel hemilaminectomy for lumbar stenosis-associated radiculopathy.
    Parker SL, Fulchiero EC, Davis BJ, Adogwa O, Aaronson OS, Cheng JS, Devin CJ, McGirt MJ.
    Spine J; 2011 Aug; 11(8):705-11. PubMed ID: 21641874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. MOS short form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience.
    Glassman S, Gornet MF, Branch C, Polly D, Peloza J, Schwender JD, Carreon L.
    Spine J; 2006 Aug; 6(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 16413443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 91.