These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


212 related items for PubMed ID: 21963038

  • 1. Simultaneous backscatter and attenuation estimation using a least squares method with constraints.
    Nam K, Zagzebski JA, Hall TJ.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Dec; 37(12):2096-104. PubMed ID: 21963038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter estimates in layered tissue-mimicking phantoms among three clinical scanners.
    Nam K, Rosado-Mendez IM, Wirtzfeld LA, Ghoshal G, Pawlicki AD, Madsen EL, Lavarello RJ, Oelze ML, Zagzebski JA, O'Brien WD, Hall TJ.
    Ultrason Imaging; 2012 Oct; 34(4):209-21. PubMed ID: 23160474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of fatty proportion in fatty liver using least squares method with constraints.
    Li X, Deng Y, Yu J, Wang Y, Shamdasani V.
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014 Oct; 24(6):2811-20. PubMed ID: 25226986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter coefficient estimates of rodent-tumor-mimicking structures: comparison of results among clinical scanners.
    Nam K, Rosado-Mendez IM, Wirtzfeld LA, Pawlicki AD, Kumar V, Madsen EL, Ghoshal G, Lavarello RJ, Oelze ML, Bigelow TA, Zagzebski JA, O'Brien WD, Hall TJ.
    Ultrason Imaging; 2011 Oct; 33(4):233-50. PubMed ID: 22518954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Scatterer number density considerations in reference phantom-based attenuation estimation.
    Rubert N, Varghese T.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1680-96. PubMed ID: 24726800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Method for estimating total attenuation from a spatial map of attenuation slope for quantitative ultrasound imaging.
    Pawlicki AD, O'Brien WD.
    Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):162-72. PubMed ID: 23493614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Trade-offs in data acquisition and processing parameters for backscatter and scatterer size estimations.
    Liu W, Zagzebski JA.
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Apr; 57(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 20178900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Theoretical and phantom based investigation of the impact of sound speed and backscatter variations on attenuation slope estimation.
    Omari E, Lee H, Varghese T.
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Aug; 51(6):758-67. PubMed ID: 21477832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Improving the statistics of quantitative ultrasound techniques with deformation compounding: an experimental study.
    Herd MT, Hall TJ, Jiang J, Zagzebski JA.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Dec; 37(12):2066-74. PubMed ID: 22033132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Attenuation estimation using spectral cross-correlation.
    Kim H, Varghese T.
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 Mar; 54(3):510-9. PubMed ID: 17375820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Quantitative assessment of in vivo breast masses using ultrasound attenuation and backscatter.
    Nam K, Zagzebski JA, Hall TJ.
    Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):146-61. PubMed ID: 23493613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Attenuation and backscatter estimation using video signal analysis applied to B-mode images.
    Knipp BS, Zagzebski JA, Wilson TA, Dong F, Madsen EL.
    Ultrason Imaging; 1997 Jul; 19(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 9447670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of the impact of backscatter intensity variations on ultrasound attenuation estimation.
    Omari EA, Varghese T, Madsen EL, Frank G.
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082904. PubMed ID: 23927359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Hybrid spectral domain method for attenuation slope estimation.
    Kim H, Varghese T.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1808-19. PubMed ID: 18621468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Mechanisms for attenuation in cancellous-bone-mimicking phantoms.
    Wear KA.
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Nov; 55(11):2418-25. PubMed ID: 19049921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Acoustic Properties of Breast Fat.
    Nasief HG, Rosado-Mendez IM, Zagzebski JA, Hall TJ.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):2007-16. PubMed ID: 26446820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Amplitude based segmentation of ultrasound echoes for attenuation coefficient estimation.
    Civale J, Bamber J, Harris E.
    Ultrasonics; 2021 Mar; 111():106302. PubMed ID: 33264741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Simultaneous estimation of cortical bone thickness and acoustic wave velocity using a multivariable optimization approach: Bone phantom and in-vitro study.
    Tasinkevych Y, Podhajecki J, Falińska K, Litniewski J.
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Feb; 65():105-12. PubMed ID: 26522955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Experimental application of ultrafast imaging to spectral tissue characterization.
    Garcia-Duitama J, Chayer B, Han A, Garcia D, Oelze ML, Cloutier G.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 41(9):2506-19. PubMed ID: 26119459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of region-of-interest length on estimates of myocardial ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter.
    Baldwin SL, Holland MR, Sosnovik DE, Miller JG.
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):418-26. PubMed ID: 15789588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.