These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

287 related items for PubMed ID: 21967933

  • 1. Effects of latency on the quality and quantity of bone produced by dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis.
    Moore C, Campbell PM, Dechow PC, Ellis ML, Buschang PH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):470-8. PubMed ID: 21967933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. How does the rate of dentoalveolar distraction affect the bone regenerate produced?
    Spencer AC, Campbell PM, Dechow P, Ellis ML, Buschang PH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):e211-21. PubMed ID: 22051499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Tooth movement into distraction regenerate: when should we start?
    El Sharaby FA, El Bokle NN, El Boghdadi DM, Mostafa YA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):482-94. PubMed ID: 21457859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Dentate transport discs can be used to reconstruct large segmental mandibular defects.
    Elsalanty ME, Malavia V, Zakhary I, Mulone T, Kontogiorgos ED, Dechow PC, Opperman LA.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 73(4):745-58. PubMed ID: 25661502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of bone regenerative capacity following distraction osteogenesis of goat mandibles using two different bone cutting techniques.
    Nooh N, Abdullah WA, El-Awady Grawish M, Ramalingam S, Hassan G, Javed F, Al-Hezaimi K.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23810515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Single versus triple daily activation of the distractor: no significant effects of frequency of distraction on bone regenerate quantity and architecture.
    Djasim UM, Wolvius EB, Van Neck JW, Van Wamel A, Weinans H, Van Der Wal KGH.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2008 Apr; 36(3):143-151. PubMed ID: 18359239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular bone regenerated by bone transport distraction osteogenesis.
    Kontogiorgos E, Elsalanty ME, Zapata U, Zakhary I, Nagy WW, Dechow PC, Opperman LA.
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2011 Jul; 89(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 21556698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Possible problems of moulding the regenerate in mandibular distraction osteogenesis -- experimental aspects in a canine model.
    Kunz C, Adolphs N, Buescher P, Hammer B, Rahn B.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 33(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 16253512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Primary study of the use of a shape-memory alloy distraction device in the dog mandible for alveolar ridge distraction: determination of osteotomy techniques and evaluation of osteogenesis outcome.
    Xie M, Xiao H, Hu M, Liu H, Li Y.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 70(12):2876-83. PubMed ID: 22632929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Bone regeneration and docking site healing after bone transport distraction osteogenesis in the canine mandible.
    Nagashima LK, Rondon-Newby M, Zakhary IE, Nagy WW, Zapata U, Dechow PC, Opperman LA, Elsalanty ME.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):429-39. PubMed ID: 21601342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effects of osteoformin on mineralisation and quality of newly formed bone during mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rabbits.
    Pampu AA, Ozkaynak O, Senel FC, Cankaya M, Dolanmaz D, Ersöz S, Avunduk MC.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Dec; 108(6):833-7. PubMed ID: 19828342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Evaluation of potential damage to the regenerate during callus molding after mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Experimental study using an animal model].
    Kunz C, Adolphs N, Buescher P, Hammer B, Rahn B.
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2005 May; 9(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 15856346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis in the human mandible: a clinical and histomorphometric study.
    Sezer B, Koyuncu BÖ, Günbay T, Sezak M.
    Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 22814557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. "Pumping the regenerate": an evaluation of oscillating distraction osteogenesis in the rodent mandible.
    Greenwald JA, Luchs JS, Mehrara BJ, Spector JA, Mackool RJ, McCarthy JG, Longaker MT.
    Ann Plast Surg; 2000 May; 44(5):516-21. PubMed ID: 10805303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.