These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

295 related items for PubMed ID: 21969313

  • 1. Prospective validity of the Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR).
    Worling JR, Bookalam D, Litteljohn A.
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Jun; 24(3):203-23. PubMed ID: 21969313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Correlates of recidivism among adolescents who have sexually offended.
    Carpentier J, Proulx J.
    Sex Abuse; 2011 Dec; 23(4):434-55. PubMed ID: 21960517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A prospective investigation of factors that predict desistance from recidivism for adolescents who have sexually offended.
    Worling JR, Langton CM.
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):127-42. PubMed ID: 25201880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Predicting sexual and nonsexual recidivism in a consecutive sample of juveniles convicted of sexual offences.
    Aebi M, Plattner B, Steinhausen HC, Bessler C.
    Sex Abuse; 2011 Dec; 23(4):456-73. PubMed ID: 21406605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Prediction of adolescent sexual reoffending: a meta-analysis of the J-SOAP-II, ERASOR, J-SORRAT-II, and Static-99.
    Viljoen JL, Mordell S, Beneteau JL.
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):423-38. PubMed ID: 22353046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR): preliminary psychometric data.
    Worling JR.
    Sex Abuse; 2004 Jun; 16(3):235-54. PubMed ID: 15326883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Assessing youth who sexually offended: the predictive validity of the ERASOR, J-SOAP-II, and YLS/CMI in a non-Western context.
    Chu CM, Ng K, Fong J, Teoh J.
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Apr; 24(2):153-74. PubMed ID: 21825111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. 20-year prospective follow-up study of specialized treatment for adolescents who offended sexually.
    Worling JR, Litteljohn A, Bookalam D.
    Behav Sci Law; 2010 Apr; 28(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 19937708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Risk and protective factors for recidivism among juveniles who have offended sexually.
    Spice A, Viljoen JL, Latzman NE, Scalora MJ, Ullman D.
    Sex Abuse; 2013 Aug; 25(4):347-69. PubMed ID: 23033066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Assessment of criminal recidivism risk with adolescents who have offended sexually: a review.
    Worling JR, Långström N.
    Trauma Violence Abuse; 2003 Oct; 4(4):341-62. PubMed ID: 15006301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Validity and Reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Youth Sexual Offense Version.
    Rojas EY, Olver ME.
    Sex Abuse; 2020 Oct; 32(7):826-849. PubMed ID: 31248327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Validity of Risk Assessment Instruments Among Juveniles Who Sexually Offended: Victim Age Matters.
    Krause C, Roth A, Landolt MA, Bessler C, Aebi M.
    Sex Abuse; 2021 Jun; 33(4):379-405. PubMed ID: 32172652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Development and Validation of the Juvenile Sexual Offense Recidivism Risk Assessment Tool-II.
    Epperson DL, Ralston CA.
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Dec; 27(6):529-58. PubMed ID: 24492618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Assessing protective factors of youth who sexually offended in singapore: preliminary evidence on the utility of the DASH-13 and the SAPROF.
    Zeng G, Chu CM, Lee Y.
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):91-108. PubMed ID: 25527632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Protective factors and recidivism in accused juveniles who sexually offended.
    Klein V, Rettenberger M, Yoon D, Köhler N, Briken P.
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):71-90. PubMed ID: 25351199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Testing the validity of criminal risk assessment tools in sexually abusive youth.
    Barra S, Bessler C, Landolt MA, Aebi M.
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Nov; 30(11):1430-1443. PubMed ID: 29792506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Recidivism rates for registered and nonregistered juvenile sexual offenders.
    Letourneau EJ, Armstrong KS.
    Sex Abuse; 2008 Dec; 20(4):393-408. PubMed ID: 18948430
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Five-year accuracy of assessments of high risk for sexual recidivism of adolescents.
    Hagan MP, Anderson DL, Caldwell MS, Kemper TS.
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Feb; 54(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 18957553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparing the validity of the RM2000 scales and OGRS3 for predicting recidivism by Internet sexual offenders.
    Wakeling HC, Howard P, Barnett G.
    Sex Abuse; 2011 Mar; 23(1):146-68. PubMed ID: 21349831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Adolescents who have sexually offended: is phallometry valid?
    Rice ME, Harris GT, Lang C, Chaplin TC.
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Apr; 24(2):133-52. PubMed ID: 21960516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.