These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1074 related items for PubMed ID: 21993048

  • 1. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
    Wilson RH.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH, Cates WB.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(7):548-56. PubMed ID: 19248731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.
    Wilson RH, McArdle R, Roberts H.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):496-506. PubMed ID: 19253782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Temporal processing in low-frequency channels: effects of age and hearing loss in middle-aged listeners.
    Leigh-Paffenroth ED, Elangovan S.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Jun; 22(7):393-404. PubMed ID: 21993047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
    Vermiglio AJ, Soli SD, Freed DJ, Fisher LM.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Jun; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN), list 3: a practice list.
    Wilson RH, Watts KL.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Feb; 23(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 22353677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL, Pichora-Fuller MK, Wilson RH, Macdonald EN.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Feb; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Word recognition in multitalker babble measured with two psychophysical methods.
    Wilson RH, Burks CA, Weakley DG.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Sep; 16(8):622-30. PubMed ID: 16295249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.
    Wilson RH.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):370-395. PubMed ID: 30969910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Speech-in-Noise Assessment in the Routine Audiologic Test Battery: Relationship to Perceived Auditory Disability.
    Fitzgerald MB, Ward KM, Gianakas SP, Smith ML, Blevins NH, Swanson AP.
    Ear Hear; 2019 May; 45(4):816-826. PubMed ID: 38414136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The Relationship between Random Gap Detection and Hearing in Noise Test Performances.
    Heeke P, Vermiglio AJ, Bulla E, Velappan K, Fang X.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 May; 29(10):948-954. PubMed ID: 30479267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The 500 Hz masking-level difference and word recognition in multitalker babble for 40- to 89-year-old listeners with symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wilson RH, Weakley DG.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Jun; 16(6):367-82. PubMed ID: 16178408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Validation of a screening test of auditory function using the telephone.
    Williams-Sanchez V, McArdle RA, Wilson RH, Kidd GR, Watson CS, Bourne AL.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Jun; 25(10):937-51. PubMed ID: 25514447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm.
    Wilson RH, McArdle R, Watts KL, Smith SL.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):590-605. PubMed ID: 22967734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Telephone screening tests for functionally impaired hearing: current use in seven countries and development of a US version.
    Watson CS, Kidd GR, Miller JD, Smits C, Humes LE.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(10):757-67. PubMed ID: 23169193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of age and hearing loss on the relationship between discrimination of stochastic frequency modulation and speech perception.
    Sheft S, Shafiro V, Lorenzi C, McMullen R, Farrell C.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Sep; 33(6):709-20. PubMed ID: 22790319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 54.