These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

173 related items for PubMed ID: 22003654

  • 1. Robust estimation of kinetic parameters in dynamic PET imaging.
    Gao F, Liu H, Shi P.
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2011; 14(Pt 1):492-9. PubMed ID: 22003654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Patient-adaptive lesion metabolism analysis by dynamic PET images.
    Gao F, Liu H, Shi P.
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 3):558-65. PubMed ID: 23286175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Simultaneous estimation and segmentation from projection data in dynamic PET.
    Cui J, Yu H, Chen S, Chen Y, Liu H.
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1245-1259. PubMed ID: 30593666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Analysis of penalized likelihood image reconstruction for dynamic PET quantification.
    Wang G, Qi J.
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Apr; 28(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 19211345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparative assessment of linear least-squares, nonlinear least-squares, and Patlak graphical method for regional and local quantitative tracer kinetic modeling in cerebral dynamic 18 F-FDG PET.
    Ben Bouallègue F, Vauchot F, Mariano-Goulart D.
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1260-1271. PubMed ID: 30592540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Direct reconstruction of kinetic parameter images from dynamic PET data.
    Kamasak ME, Bouman CA, Morris ED, Sauer K.
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):636-50. PubMed ID: 15889551
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A robust state-space kinetics-guided framework for dynamic PET image reconstruction.
    Tong S, Alessio AM, Kinahan PE, Liu H, Shi P.
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Apr 21; 56(8):2481-98. PubMed ID: 21441650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of a compartmental model for estimating tumor hypoxia via FMISO dynamic PET imaging.
    Wang W, Georgi JC, Nehmeh SA, Narayanan M, Paulus T, Bal M, O'Donoghue J, Zanzonico PB, Schmidtlein CR, Lee NY, Humm JL.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May 21; 54(10):3083-99. PubMed ID: 19420418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Impact of time-of-flight on indirect 3D and direct 4D parametric image reconstruction in the presence of inconsistent dynamic PET data.
    Kotasidis FA, Mehranian A, Zaidi H.
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 May 07; 61(9):3443-71. PubMed ID: 27049697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Fast parametric imaging algorithm for dual-input biomedical system parameter estimation.
    Choi HC, Chen S, Feng D, Wong KP.
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan 07; 81(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 16376452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Indirect methods for improving parameter estimation of PET kinetic models.
    Huang HM, Liu CC, Lin C.
    Med Phys; 2019 Apr 07; 46(4):1777-1784. PubMed ID: 30762875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. An open tool for input function estimation and quantification of dynamic PET FDG brain scans.
    Bertrán M, Martínez N, Carbajal G, Fernández A, Gómez Á.
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Aug 07; 11(8):1419-30. PubMed ID: 26514683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Error-corrected estimation of regional kinetic parameter histograms directly from pet projections.
    Pölönen H, Niemi J, Ruotsalainen U.
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec 21; 55(24):7573-86. PubMed ID: 21098924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Searching for alternatives to full kinetic analysis in 18F-FDG PET: an extension of the simplified kinetic analysis method.
    Hapdey S, Buvat I, Carson JM, Carrasquillo JA, Whatley M, Bacharach SL.
    J Nucl Med; 2011 Apr 21; 52(4):634-41. PubMed ID: 21421718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A Conway-Maxwell-Poisson (CMP) model to address data dispersion on positron emission tomography.
    Santarelli MF, Della Latta D, Scipioni M, Positano V, Landini L.
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Oct 01; 77():90-101. PubMed ID: 27522237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Dynamic whole-body PET parametric imaging: II. Task-oriented statistical estimation.
    Karakatsanis NA, Lodge MA, Zhou Y, Wahl RL, Rahmim A.
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct 21; 58(20):7419-45. PubMed ID: 24080994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Dynamic dual-tracer PET reconstruction.
    Gao F, Liu H, Jian Y, Shi P.
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2009 Oct 21; 21():38-49. PubMed ID: 19694251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. "Population" approach improves parameter estimation of kinetic models from dynamic PET data.
    Bertoldo A, Sparacino G, Cobelli C.
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Mar 21; 23(3):297-306. PubMed ID: 15027522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. PET kinetic analysis: error consideration of quantitative analysis in dynamic studies.
    Ikoma Y, Watabe H, Shidahara M, Naganawa M, Kimura Y.
    Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Jan 21; 22(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 18250982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Short-duration dynamic FDG PET imaging: Optimization and clinical application.
    Samimi R, Kamali-Asl A, Geramifar P, van den Hoff J, Rahmim A.
    Phys Med; 2020 Dec 21; 80():193-200. PubMed ID: 33189050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.