These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS. Kim JS, Lee SM, Cha ES. Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Clustered microcalcifications of intermediate concern detected on digital mammography: ultrasound assessment. Yu PC, Lee YW, Chou FF, Wu SC, Huang CC, Ng SH, Sheen-Chen SM, Ko SF. Breast; 2011 Dec; 20(6):495-500. PubMed ID: 21723728 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Occurrence and positive predictive value of additional nonmass findings for risk stratification of breast microcalcifications in mammography. Rominger MB, Sax EV, Figiel JH, Timmesfeld N. Can Assoc Radiol J; 2013 Nov; 64(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 23298860 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of 2D Synthetic Mammography Versus Digital Mammography in the Detection of Microcalcifications at Screening. Dodelzon K, Simon K, Dou E, Levy AD, Michaels AY, Askin G, Katzen JT. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jun; 214(6):1436-1444. PubMed ID: 32255687 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of digital screening mammography among older women in the United States. Henderson LM, O'Meara ES, Braithwaite D, Onega T, Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Cancer; 2015 May 01; 121(9):1379-86. PubMed ID: 25537958 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Sonographic findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ. Lee MH, Ko EY, Han BK, Shin JH, Ko ES, Hahn SY. J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 Oct 01; 41(8):465-71. PubMed ID: 23949917 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]