These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

131 related items for PubMed ID: 22017801

  • 1. Expected satiation after repeated consumption of low- or high-energy-dense soup.
    Hogenkamp PS, Brunstrom JM, Stafleu A, Mars M, de Graaf C.
    Br J Nutr; 2012 Jul 14; 108(1):182-90. PubMed ID: 22017801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of salt intensity on ad libitum intake of tomato soup similar in palatability and on salt preference after consumption.
    Bolhuis DP, Lakemond CM, de Wijk RA, Luning PA, de Graaf C.
    Chem Senses; 2010 Nov 14; 35(9):789-99. PubMed ID: 20705808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The effect of soup on satiation.
    Himaya A, Louis-Sylvestre J.
    Appetite; 1998 Apr 14; 30(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 9573453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of viscosity on learned satiation.
    Mars M, Hogenkamp PS, Gosses AM, Stafleu A, De Graaf C.
    Physiol Behav; 2009 Aug 04; 98(1-2):60-6. PubMed ID: 19394350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Increased satiety after intake of a chocolate milk drink compared with a carbonated beverage, but no difference in subsequent ad libitum lunch intake.
    Harper A, James A, Flint A, Astrup A.
    Br J Nutr; 2007 Mar 04; 97(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 17313721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Eating rate during a fixed-portion meal does not affect postprandial appetite and gut peptides or energy intake during a subsequent meal.
    Karl JP, Young AJ, Montain SJ.
    Physiol Behav; 2011 Mar 28; 102(5):524-31. PubMed ID: 21238470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Dietary fat and appetite: similarities and differences in the satiating effect of meals supplemented with either fat or carbohydrate.
    Cotton JR, Burley VJ, Weststrate JA, Blundell JE.
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2007 Jun 28; 20(3):186-99. PubMed ID: 17539869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Sensitivity of ad libitum meals to detect changes in hunger. Restricted-item or multi-item testmeals in the design of preload appetite studies.
    Wiessing KR, Xin L, McGill AT, Budgett SC, Strik CM, Poppitt SD.
    Appetite; 2012 Jun 28; 58(3):1076-82. PubMed ID: 22342358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Eating slowly led to decreases in energy intake within meals in healthy women.
    Andrade AM, Greene GW, Melanson KJ.
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2008 Jul 28; 108(7):1186-91. PubMed ID: 18589027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Are You Sure? Confidence about the Satiating Capacity of a Food Affects Subsequent Food Intake.
    Schiöth HB, Ferriday D, Davies SR, Benedict C, Elmståhl H, Brunstrom JM, Hogenkamp PS.
    Nutrients; 2015 Jun 24; 7(7):5088-97. PubMed ID: 26115087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of a healthy meal course on spontaneous energy intake, satiety and palatability.
    Poortvliet PC, Bérubé-Parent S, Drapeau V, Lamarche B, Blundell JE, Tremblay A.
    Br J Nutr; 2007 Mar 24; 97(3):584-90. PubMed ID: 17313722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.