These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

81 related items for PubMed ID: 22023486

  • 1. Acceptable noise level with Danish, Swedish, and non-semantic speech materials.
    Brännström KJ, Lantz J, Nielsen LH, Olsen SØ.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Mar; 51(3):146-56. PubMed ID: 22023486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users.
    Olsen SØ, Lantz J, Nielsen LH, Brännström KJ.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):678-88. PubMed ID: 22731922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Acceptable noise level: repeatability with Danish and non-semantic speech materials for adults with normal hearing.
    Olsen SØ, Nielsen LH, Lantz J, Brännström KJ.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):557-63. PubMed ID: 22537032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The equivalence of acceptable noise level (ANL) with English, Mandarin, and non-semantic speech: a study across the U.S. and Taiwan.
    Ho HC, Wu YH, Hsiao SH, Stangl E, Lentz EJ, Bentler RA.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 23153252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The impact of listening condition on background noise acceptance for young adults with normal hearing.
    Gordon-Hickey S, Moore RE, Estis JM.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 55(5):1356-72. PubMed ID: 22411277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Acceptance of noise with intelligible, reversed, and unfamiliar primary discourse.
    Gordon-Hickey S, Moore RE.
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Dec; 17(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 18840706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Contribution of high-frequency information to the acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Plyler PN, Madix SG, Thelin JW, Johnston KW.
    Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 18056883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS, Chisolm TH, Blasco GP, Shinnick LJ, Ketter KJ, Krause JC.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 19390441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Freyaldenhoven MC, Plyler PN, Thelin JW, Hedrick MS.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 17675593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of reverberation on acceptable noise level measurements in younger and older adults.
    Adams EM, Gordon-Hickey S, Moore RE, Morlas H.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Nov; 49(11):832-8. PubMed ID: 20936995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Type of Speech Material Affects Acceptable Noise Level Test Outcome.
    Koch X, Dingemanse G, Goedegebure A, Janse E.
    Front Psychol; 2016 Nov; 7():186. PubMed ID: 26952145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA, Emanuel DC, Letowski TR.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Nov; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The acceptable noise level: the effect of repeated measurements.
    Brännström KJ, Holm L, Kastberg T, Olsen SØ.
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 24003981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Acceptance of background noise, working memory capacity, and auditory evoked potentials in subjects with normal hearing.
    Brännström KJ, Zunic E, Borovac A, Ibertsson T.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Jan; 23(7):542-52. PubMed ID: 22992261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984 Jan; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The effect of extending high-frequency bandwidth on the acceptable noise level (ANL) of hearing-impaired listeners.
    Johnson E, Ricketts T, Hornsby B.
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Aug; 48(6):353-62. PubMed ID: 19925343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effect of repeated measurements and working memory on the most comfortable level in the ANL test.
    Brännström KJ, Olsen SØ, Holm L, Kastberg T, Ibertsson T.
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Nov; 53(11):787-95. PubMed ID: 25156233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Determining perceived sound quality in a simulated hearing aid using the international speech test signal.
    Arehart KH, Kates JM, Anderson MC, Moats P.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Nov; 32(4):533-5. PubMed ID: 21325947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: a multi-center study.
    Jansen S, Luts H, Wagener KC, Kollmeier B, Del Rio M, Dauman R, James C, Fraysse B, Vormès E, Frachet B, Wouters J, van Wieringen A.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Mar; 51(3):164-73. PubMed ID: 22122354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.