These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

274 related items for PubMed ID: 22037129

  • 1. The number of full-sine cycles per pulse influences the efficacy of multicycle transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Pechmann A, Delvendahl I, Bergmann TO, Ritter C, Hartwigsen G, Gleich B, Gattinger N, Mall V, Siebner HR.
    Brain Stimul; 2012 Apr; 5(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 22037129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The role of pulse shape in motor cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation using full-sine stimuli.
    Delvendahl I, Gattinger N, Berger T, Gleich B, Siebner HR, Mall V.
    PLoS One; 2014 Apr; 9(12):e115247. PubMed ID: 25514673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Transcranial magnetic stimulation with a half-sine wave pulse elicits direction-specific effects in human motor cortex.
    Jung NH, Delvendahl I, Pechmann A, Gleich B, Gattinger N, Siebner HR, Mall V.
    BMC Neurosci; 2012 Nov 05; 13():139. PubMed ID: 23126287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Efficient Mapping of the Motor Cortex with Navigated Biphasic Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
    Pitkänen M, Kallioniemi E, Järnefelt G, Karhu J, Julkunen P.
    Brain Topogr; 2018 Nov 05; 31(6):963-971. PubMed ID: 29971634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Cumulative effects of single TMS pulses during beta-tACS are stimulation intensity-dependent.
    Raco V, Bauer R, Norim S, Gharabaghi A.
    Brain Stimul; 2017 Nov 05; 10(6):1055-1060. PubMed ID: 28779945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Influence of waveform and current direction on short-interval intracortical facilitation: a paired-pulse TMS study.
    Delvendahl I, Lindemann H, Jung NH, Pechmann A, Siebner HR, Mall V.
    Brain Stimul; 2014 Nov 05; 7(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 24075915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Corticomotor responses to triple-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation: Effects of interstimulus interval and stimulus intensity.
    Sacco P, Turner D, Rothwell J, Thickbroom G.
    Brain Stimul; 2009 Jan 05; 2(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 20633401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Half sine, monophasic and biphasic transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.
    Sommer M, Alfaro A, Rummel M, Speck S, Lang N, Tings T, Paulus W.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Apr 05; 117(4):838-44. PubMed ID: 16495145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The Effects of Waveform and Current Direction on the Efficacy and Test-Retest Reliability of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
    Davila-Pérez P, Jannati A, Fried PJ, Cudeiro Mazaira J, Pascual-Leone A.
    Neuroscience; 2018 Nov 21; 393():97-109. PubMed ID: 30300705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. TMS-related potentials and artifacts in combined TMS-EEG measurements: Comparison of three different TMS devices.
    Van Doren J, Langguth B, Schecklmann M.
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2015 May 21; 45(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 25892330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Spread of electrical activity at cortical level after repetitive magnetic stimulation in normal subjects.
    Lorenzano C, Gilio F, Inghilleri M, Conte A, Fofi L, Manfredi M, Berardelli A.
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Nov 21; 147(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12410333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effects of pulse width, waveform and current direction in the cortex: A combined cTMS-EEG study.
    Casula EP, Rocchi L, Hannah R, Rothwell JC.
    Brain Stimul; 2018 Nov 21; 11(5):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 29709505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Pulse Width Affects Scalp Sensation of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
    Peterchev AV, Luber B, Westin GG, Lisanby SH.
    Brain Stimul; 2017 Nov 21; 10(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 28029593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of cortical EEG responses to realistic sham versus real TMS of human motor cortex.
    Gordon PC, Desideri D, Belardinelli P, Zrenner C, Ziemann U.
    Brain Stimul; 2018 Nov 21; 11(6):1322-1330. PubMed ID: 30143417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Conditioning the cortical silent period with paired transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Silbert BI, Thickbroom GW.
    Brain Stimul; 2013 Jul 21; 6(4):541-4. PubMed ID: 23092703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Does second-scale intertrial interval affect motor evoked potentials induced by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation?
    Julkunen P, Säisänen L, Hukkanen T, Danner N, Könönen M.
    Brain Stimul; 2012 Oct 21; 5(4):526-32. PubMed ID: 21962979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Ongoing cumulative effects of single TMS pulses on corticospinal excitability: An intra- and inter-block investigation.
    Pellicciari MC, Miniussi C, Ferrari C, Koch G, Bortoletto M.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan 21; 127(1):621-628. PubMed ID: 25823698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Two different effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the human motor cortex during the pre-movement period.
    Hashimoto T, Inaba D, Matsumura M, Naito E.
    Neurosci Res; 2004 Dec 21; 50(4):427-36. PubMed ID: 15567480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Covariation of the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation in a resting hand muscle.
    Vallence AM, Rurak BK, Fujiyama H, Hammond GR.
    Exp Brain Res; 2023 Mar 21; 241(3):927-936. PubMed ID: 36811686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison between short train, monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the human motor cortex.
    Arai N, Okabe S, Furubayashi T, Terao Y, Yuasa K, Ugawa Y.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar 21; 116(3):605-13. PubMed ID: 15721074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.