These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

119 related items for PubMed ID: 2204590

  • 1. [Computer assisted evaluation of the status of professionally important functions of an operator].
    Navakatikian AO, Kal'nish VV.
    Gig Sanit; 1990 May; (5):24-7. PubMed ID: 2204590
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Evaluation of the work of nurses by reckoning with the results of socialist competition].
    Khorov GV, Alekseev AV, Borovitskaia LV.
    Med Sestra; 1988 Jun; 47(6):11-4. PubMed ID: 3412159
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Evaluation of the quality of professional activities of military specialists].
    Reshetnikov MM.
    Voen Med Zh; 1985 Jul; (7):47-9. PubMed ID: 4049774
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Assessment of the work efficiency of nurses].
    Vedenko BG, Sushchik LP, Vedenko LB.
    Med Sestra; 1985 Sep; 44(9):24-6. PubMed ID: 3853062
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A model comprehensive psychiatric fitness-for-duty evaluation.
    Reynolds NT.
    Occup Med; 2002 Sep; 17(1):105-18, v. PubMed ID: 11726340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Development of a job-specific, criteria-based performance appraisal tool for staff pharmacists.
    Hoffman RP.
    Hosp Pharm; 1986 Mar; 21(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 10275584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Developing a common performance evaluation system for all employees of a hospital.
    Burke RJ, Goodale JG.
    Hosp Adm Can; 1975 Feb; 17(2):26-30. PubMed ID: 10241181
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Clarity of performance-relevant priorities in work disability proceedings].
    Mietzelfeldt M, Lorenz R.
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1985 Dec; 31(12):692-6. PubMed ID: 4096038
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A critique of performance appraisal systems.
    Yager E.
    Pers J; 1981 Feb; 60(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 10249832
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The "refined" performance evaluation monitoring system: best of both worlds.
    Schick ME.
    Pers J; 1980 Jan; 59(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 10245041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Establishing an effective employee evaluation.
    Ulrich DJ.
    Dent Assist (Waco Tx); 1985 Feb; 4(4):7-9. PubMed ID: 3855721
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. 5 steps to a performance evaluation system.
    Capko J.
    Fam Pract Manag; 2003 Mar; 10(3):43-8. PubMed ID: 12685162
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. How'm I doing? Current perspectives on performance appraisals and the evaluation of work.
    Gummer B.
    Adm Soc Work; 1984 Mar; 8(2):91-102. PubMed ID: 10310644
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Functions and techniques of employee evaluations.
    Holt GA.
    Curr Concepts Hosp Pharm Manage; 1983 Mar; 5(2):15-7. PubMed ID: 10260704
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Classification evaluation of electroencephalograms for determining fitness for operator training].
    Gerasimov AV.
    Fiziol Zh (1978); 1990 Mar; 36(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 2361555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Making performance appraisals perform: the use of team evaluation.
    Edwards MR, Sproull JR.
    Personnel; 1985 Mar; 62(3):28-32. PubMed ID: 10270457
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [A method of work performance appraisal at the Pediatric Department in Levoca].
    Ivicic L, Kacejová R.
    Cesk Pediatr; 1987 Mar; 42(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 3581272
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Performance evaluation in a medical environment.
    Harrison RL.
    Med Group Manage; 1978 Mar; 25(5):22-3. PubMed ID: 10238843
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Appraisal systems. Looking forward to performance.
    Metcalfe BA.
    Health Soc Serv J; 1985 Aug 15; 95(4961):1017-8. PubMed ID: 10273758
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Performance appraisal blues: who should get the pink slip?
    Riordan J.
    Respir Ther; 1981 Aug 15; 11(6):107-8, 110-11. PubMed ID: 10253943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.