These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

257 related items for PubMed ID: 22056301

  • 1. Latest generation, wide-angle, high-definition colonoscopes increase adenoma detection rate.
    Adler A, Aminalai A, Aschenbeck J, Drossel R, Mayr M, Scheel M, Schröder A, Yenerim T, Wiedenmann B, Gauger U, Roll S, Rösch T.
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Feb; 10(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 22056301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.
    East JE, Stavrindis M, Thomas-Gibson S, Guenther T, Tekkis PP, Saunders BP.
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Sep 15; 28(6):768-76. PubMed ID: 18715401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening.
    Kahi CJ, Anderson JC, Waxman I, Kessler WR, Imperiale TF, Li X, Rex DK.
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Jun 15; 105(6):1301-7. PubMed ID: 20179689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3).
    Adler A, Wegscheider K, Lieberman D, Aminalai A, Aschenbeck J, Drossel R, Mayr M, Mroß M, Scheel M, Schröder A, Gerber K, Stange G, Roll S, Gauger U, Wiedenmann B, Altenhofen L, Rosch T.
    Gut; 2013 Feb 15; 62(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 22442161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates.
    Chung SJ, Kim D, Song JH, Park MJ, Kim YS, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jul 15; 72(1):136-42. PubMed ID: 20493487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.
    Madhoun MF, Tierney WM.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan 15; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of standard vs high-definition, wide-angle colonoscopy for polyp detection: a randomized controlled trial.
    Tribonias G, Theodoropoulou A, Konstantinidis K, Vardas E, Karmiris K, Chroniaris N, Chlouverakis G, Paspatis GA.
    Colorectal Dis; 2010 Oct 15; 12(10 Online):e260-6. PubMed ID: 19930146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.