These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

128 related items for PubMed ID: 22088041

  • 1. Interaural spectral asymmetry and sensitivity to interaural time differences.
    Brown CA, Yost WA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL358-64. PubMed ID: 22088041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Spectral overlap and interaural time difference sensitivity: possible role of binaural interference.
    Brown CA, Yost WA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):EL374-80. PubMed ID: 25994736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effects of aging and interaural delay on the detection of a break in the interaural correlation between two sounds.
    Li L, Huang J, Wu X, Qi JG, Schneider BA.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 19194287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Factors affecting the use of envelope interaural time differences in reverberation.
    Monaghan JJ, Krumbholz K, Seeber BU.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2288-300. PubMed ID: 23556596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Sensitivity to a break in interaural correlation is co-modulated by intensity level and interaural delay.
    Kong L, Xie Z, Lu L, Wu X, Li L.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL114-8. PubMed ID: 22894308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Binaural detection with narrowband and wideband reproducible noise maskers. IV. Models using interaural time, level, and envelope differences.
    Mao J, Carney LH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Feb; 135(2):824-37. PubMed ID: 25234891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Interaural time processing when stimulus bandwidth differs at the two ears.
    Brown CA, Yost WA.
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013 Feb; 787():247-54. PubMed ID: 23716230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Nonuniform temporal weighting of interaural time differences in 500 Hz tones.
    Stecker GC, Bibee JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3541-7. PubMed ID: 24907817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Trading of interaural differences in high-rate Gabor click trains.
    Stecker GC.
    Hear Res; 2010 Sep 01; 268(1-2):202-12. PubMed ID: 20547218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Sensitivity to Envelope Interaural Time Differences at High Modulation Rates.
    Monaghan JJ, Bleeck S, McAlpine D.
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec 30; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Interaural differences in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) auditory nerve response to jawphone click stimuli.
    Mulsow J, Finneran JJ, Houser DS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep 30; 136(3):1402. PubMed ID: 25190413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Neural Processing of Acoustic and Electric Interaural Time Differences in Normal-Hearing Gerbils.
    Vollmer M.
    J Neurosci; 2018 Aug 01; 38(31):6949-6966. PubMed ID: 29959238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Sensitivity to envelope-based interaural delays at high frequencies: center frequency affects the envelope rate-limitation.
    Bernstein LR, Trahiotis C.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Feb 01; 135(2):808-16. PubMed ID: 25234889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Perceptual sensitivity to high-frequency interaural time differences created by rustling sounds.
    Ewert SD, Kaiser K, Kernschmidt L, Wiegrebe L.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb 01; 13(1):131-43. PubMed ID: 22124890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. II. Characteristic delays and comparison with responses in the medial superior olive.
    Joris PX.
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Oct 01; 76(4):2137-56. PubMed ID: 8899590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Temporal weighting functions for interaural time and level differences. II. The effect of binaurally synchronous temporal jitter.
    Brown AD, Stecker GC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan 01; 129(1):293-300. PubMed ID: 21303010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effects of reference interaural time and intensity differences on binaural performance in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Koehnke J, Culotta CP, Hawley ML, Colburn HS.
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug 01; 16(4):331-53. PubMed ID: 8549890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Neural maps of interaural time and intensity differences in the optic tectum of the barn owl.
    Olsen JF, Knudsen EI, Esterly SD.
    J Neurosci; 1989 Jul 01; 9(7):2591-605. PubMed ID: 2746340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Observer weighting of interaural cues in positive and negative envelope slopes of amplitude-modulated waveforms.
    Hsieh IH, Petrosyan A, Gonçalves ÓF, Hickok G, Saberi K.
    Hear Res; 2011 Jul 01; 277(1-2):143-51. PubMed ID: 21272630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.