These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

653 related items for PubMed ID: 22092480

  • 1. Evaluation of peri-implant bone resorption around Straumann Bone Level implants placed in areas reconstructed with autogenous vertical onlay bone grafts.
    Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M, Corsi E.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1012-21. PubMed ID: 22092480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The role of pericranium grafts in the reduction of postoperative dehiscences and bone resorption after reconstruction of severely deficient edentulous ridges with autogenous onlay bone grafts.
    Chiapasco M, Autelitano L, Rabbiosi D, Zaniboni M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):679-87. PubMed ID: 22551410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Implants in reconstructed bone: a comparative study on the outcome of Straumann® tissue level and bone level implants placed in vertically deficient alveolar ridges treated by means of autogenous onlay bone grafts.
    Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Feb; 16(1):32-50. PubMed ID: 22494433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Autogenous onlay bone grafts vs. alveolar distraction osteogenesis for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a 2-4-year prospective study on humans.
    Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Rimondini L.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Aug; 18(4):432-40. PubMed ID: 17501979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Dental implants placed in severely atrophic jaws reconstructed with autogenous calvarium, bovine bone mineral, and collagen membranes: A 3- to 19-year retrospective follow-up study.
    Chiapasco M, Tommasato G, Palombo D, Scarnò D, Zaniboni M, Del Fabbro M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jul; 29(7):725-740. PubMed ID: 29876968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Dental implants placed in expanded narrow edentulous ridges with the Extension Crest device. A 1-3-year multicenter follow-up study.
    Chiapasco M, Ferrini F, Casentini P, Accardi S, Zaniboni M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 16672021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Long-term peri-implant bone level changes of non-vascularized fibula bone grafted edentulous patients.
    Duttenhoefer F, Nack C, Doll C, Raguse JD, Hell B, Stricker A, Nelson K, Nahles S.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 25863644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The influence of mandibular dentition on implant failures in bone-grafted edentulous maxillae.
    Becktor JP, Eckert SE, Isaksson S, Keller EE.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002 Jun; 17(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 11858576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Blocks of autogenous bone versus xenografts for the rehabilitation of atrophic jaws with dental implants: preliminary data from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Pistilli R, Felice P, Piatelli M, Nisii A, Barausse C, Esposito M.
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014 Jun; 7(2):153-71. PubMed ID: 24977250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Surgical-prosthodontic reconstruction of advanced maxillary bone compromise with autogenous onlay block bone grafts and osseointegrated endosseous implants: a 12-year study of 32 consecutive patients.
    Keller EE, Tolman DE, Eckert S.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999 Jun; 14(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 10212536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Maxillary alveolar ridge reconstruction with nonvascularized autogenous block bone: clinical results.
    Barone A, Covani U.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Oct; 65(10):2039-46. PubMed ID: 17884536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
    Urban IA, Jovanovic SA, Lozada JL.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Oct; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A prospective study of implants placed in augmented sinuses with minimal and moderate residual crestal bone: results after 1 to 5 years.
    Urban IA, Lozada JL.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Oct; 25(6):1203-12. PubMed ID: 21197499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Bilateral vertical ridge augmentation with block grafts and guided bone regeneration in the posterior mandible: a case report.
    Peñarrocha MA, Vina JA, Maestre L, Peñarrocha-Oltra D.
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Sep; 38 Spec No():533-7. PubMed ID: 21231866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Dental implants placed simultaneously with bone grafts in horizontal defects: a clinical retrospective study with 37 patients.
    Boronat A, Carrillo C, Penarrocha M, Pennarocha M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Sep; 25(1):189-96. PubMed ID: 20209201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Deep-frozen allogeneic onlay bone grafts for reconstruction of atrophic maxillary alveolar ridges: a preliminary study.
    Barone A, Varanini P, Orlando B, Tonelli P, Covani U.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jun; 67(6):1300-6. PubMed ID: 19446220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Implant survival in maxillary and mandibular osseous onlay grafts and native bone: a 3-year clinical and computerized tomographic follow-up.
    Sbordone L, Toti P, Menchini-Fabris G, Sbordone C, Guidetti F.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Jun; 24(4):695-703. PubMed ID: 19885411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Outcome of oral implants after autogenous bone reconstruction].
    Kamal D, Abida S, Jammet P, Goudot P, Yachouh J.
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Apr; 110(2):86-8. PubMed ID: 19327803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Mandibular bone harvesting for alveolar reconstruction and implant placement: subjective and objective cross-sectional evaluation of donor and recipient site up to 4 years.
    Cordaro L, Torsello F, Miuccio MT, di Torresanto VM, Eliopoulos D.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1320-6. PubMed ID: 21443607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Efficacy of cancellous block allograft augmentation prior to implant placement in the posterior atrophic mandible.
    Nissan J, Ghelfan O, Mardinger O, Calderon S, Chaushu G.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):279-85. PubMed ID: 19673921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.