These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


771 related items for PubMed ID: 22094153

  • 21. [A comparative study between Coflex interspinous dynamic reconstruction and lumbar 360 degrees fusion in treating single-level degenerative lumbar spinal disorders].
    Liu J, Liu H, Li T, Zeng J, Song Y, Liu L, Gong Q.
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 25(6):693-8. PubMed ID: 21735783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
    Sim HB, Murovic JA, Cho BY, Lim TJ, Park J.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Does superior-segment facet violation or laminectomy destabilize the adjacent level in lumbar transpedicular fixation? An in vitro human cadaveric assessment.
    Cardoso MJ, Dmitriev AE, Helgeson M, Lehman RA, Kuklo TR, Rosner MK.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Dec 15; 33(26):2868-73. PubMed ID: 19092616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. A biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous device (Coflex) used to stabilize the lumbar spine.
    Tsai KJ, Murakami H, Lowery GL, Hutton WC.
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2006 Dec 15; 15(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 17087886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. A biomechanical study of the instrumented and adjacent lumbar levels after In-Space interspinous spacer insertion.
    Park SW, Lim TJ, Park J.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 May 15; 12(5):560-9. PubMed ID: 20433305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Cunningham BW, Gordon JD, Dmitriev AE, Hu N, McAfee PC.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct 15; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Biomechanical effects of hybrid stabilization on the risk of proximal adjacent-segment degeneration following lumbar spinal fusion using an interspinous device or a pedicle screw-based dynamic fixator.
    Lee CH, Kim YE, Lee HJ, Kim DG, Kim CH.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec 15; 27(6):643-649. PubMed ID: 28937328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Biomechanical effects of disc degeneration and hybrid fixation on the transition and adjacent lumbar segments: trade-off between junctional problem, motion preservation, and load protection.
    Chuang WH, Lin SC, Chen SH, Wang CW, Tsai WC, Chen YJ, Hwang JR.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Nov 15; 37(24):E1488-97. PubMed ID: 22872225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
    Wilke HJ, Schmidt H, Werner K, Schmölz W, Drumm J.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov 15; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis.
    Akamaru T, Kawahara N, Tim Yoon S, Minamide A, Su Kim K, Tomita K, Hutton WC.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul 15; 28(14):1560-6. PubMed ID: 12865845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. [Effect of Coflex interspinous stabilization and vertebral arch pedicle screw implantation on the stability of three-dimensional motions of the lumbar spine].
    Mao ZX, Jiang JM, Yan HB, Zhao WD, Wang FL, Wu Y, Li Y.
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2010 Apr 15; 30(4):863-6. PubMed ID: 20423867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. The protective role of dynamic stabilization on the adjacent disc to a rigid instrumented level. An in vitro biomechanical analysis.
    Cabello J, Cavanilles-Walker JM, Iborra M, Ubierna MT, Covaro A, Roca J.
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Apr 15; 133(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 23371399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine with a hinged pedicle screw rod system: an in vitro experiment.
    Schmoelz W, Onder U, Martin A, von Strempel A.
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Oct 15; 18(10):1478-85. PubMed ID: 19504129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Determination of the biomechanical effect of an interspinous process device on implanted and adjacent lumbar spinal segments using a hybrid testing protocol: a finite-element study.
    Erbulut DU, Zafarparandeh I, Hassan CR, Lazoglu I, Ozer AF.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Aug 15; 23(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 25932601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Biomechanical testing of a PEEK-based dynamic instrumentation device in a lumbar spine model.
    Herren C, Beckmann A, Meyer S, Pishnamaz M, Mundt M, Sobottke R, Prescher A, Stoffel M, Markert B, Kobbe P, Pape HC, Eysel P, Siewe J.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2017 May 15; 44():67-74. PubMed ID: 28342975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a locked plate and wedged graft effectively stabilizes flexion-distraction stage-3 injury in the lower cervical spine: a biomechanical study.
    Paxinos O, Ghanayem AJ, Zindrick MR, Voronov LI, Havey RM, Carandang G, Hadjipavlou A, Patwardhan AG.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan 01; 34(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 19127153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Interpedicular travel in the evaluation of spinal implants: an application in posterior dynamic stabilization.
    Cook DJ, Yeager MS, Cheng BC.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May 15; 37(11):923-31. PubMed ID: 22024893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Biomechanical effect of interspinous dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion on range of motion of the transition segment and the adjacent segment.
    Kong C, Lu S, Hai Y, Zang L.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2015 May 15; 30(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 25779689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
    Hwang SH, Kayanja M, Milks RA, Benzel EC.
    Spine J; 2007 May 15; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Biomechanics of dynamic rod segments for achieving transitional stiffness with lumbosacral fusion.
    Lazaro BC, Reyes PM, Newcomb AG, Yaqoobi AS, Brasiliense LB, Sonntag VK, Crawford NR.
    Neurosurgery; 2013 Sep 15; 73(3):517-27. PubMed ID: 23756746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 39.