These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

116 related items for PubMed ID: 22100835

  • 1. Gaussian wavelet transform and classifier to reliably estimate latency of multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP).
    Thie J, Sriram P, Klistorner A, Graham SL.
    Vision Res; 2012 Jan 01; 52(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 22100835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Slow pattern-reversal stimulation facilitates the assessment of retinal function with multifocal recordings.
    Hoffmann MB, Flechner JJ.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Feb 01; 119(2):409-17. PubMed ID: 18054278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Exploring the methods of data analysis in multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    Malmqvist L, De Santiago L, Fraser C, Klistorner A, Hamann S.
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug 01; 133(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 27312134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Simulated nystagmus reduces pattern-reversal more strongly than pattern-onset multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    Hoffmann MB, Seufert PS.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul 01; 116(7):1723-32. PubMed ID: 15908272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of temporal sparseness and dichoptic presentation on multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    James AC, Ruseckaite R, Maddess T.
    Vis Neurosci; 2005 Jul 01; 22(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 15842740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Multifocal visual evoked potentials--a method study of responses from small sectors of the visual field.
    Bengtsson M, Andréasson S, Andersson G.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Aug 01; 116(8):1975-83. PubMed ID: 15998602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Identifying preperimetric functional loss in glaucoma: a blue-on-yellow multifocal visual evoked potentials study.
    Arvind H, Graham S, Leaney J, Grigg J, Goldberg I, Billson F, Klistorner A.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun 01; 116(6):1134-41. PubMed ID: 19395037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Early latency in pattern-reversal and flash mfVEP].
    Unterlauft JD, Meigen T.
    Ophthalmologe; 2008 Dec 01; 105(12):1135-41. PubMed ID: 18542967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Multifocal visual evoked potentials for quantifying optic nerve dysfunction in patients with optic disc drusen.
    Malmqvist L, de Santiago L, Boquete L, Hamann S.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun 01; 95(4):357-362. PubMed ID: 28139892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Multifocal visual evoked potential responses to pattern-reversal, pattern-onset, pattern-offset, and sparse pulse stimuli.
    Fortune B, Demirel S, Bui BV.
    Vis Neurosci; 2009 Jun 01; 26(2):227-35. PubMed ID: 19250600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Variation of topographic visually evoked potentials across the visual field.
    Yu MZ, Brown B.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Jan 01; 17(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 9135809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Topographic comparison of the visual function on multifocal visual evoked potentials with optic nerve structure on heidelberg retinal tomography.
    Punjabi OS, Stamper RL, Bostrom AG, Han Y, Lin SC.
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Mar 01; 115(3):440-6. PubMed ID: 18096233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Dichoptic stimulation improves detection of glaucoma with multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    Arvind H, Klistorner A, Graham S, Grigg J, Goldberg I, Klistorner A, Billson FA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct 01; 48(10):4590-6. PubMed ID: 17898282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The detection of small relative simulated field defects using multifocal VEPs.
    Chan HL, Chu HW, Ng YF, Tam WK, Young SM, Lam CH, Cheung AL.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 May 01; 25(3):224-32. PubMed ID: 15854069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Steady-state multifocal visual evoked potential (ssmfVEP) using dartboard stimulation as a possible tool for objective visual field assessment.
    Horn FK, Selle F, Hohberger B, Kremers J.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb 01; 254(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 26553198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A principal component analysis of multifocal pattern reversal VEP.
    Zhang X, Hood DC.
    J Vis; 2004 Feb 04; 4(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 14995897
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Reproducibility of multifocal VEP latency using different stimulus presentations.
    Sriram P, Klistorner A, Arvind H, Graham SL.
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2012 Aug 04; 125(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22669286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects.
    Klistorner AI, Graham SL, Grigg JR, Billson FA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 May 04; 39(6):937-50. PubMed ID: 9579473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Reproducibility of multifocal visual evoked potential and traditional visual evoked potential in normal and multiple sclerosis eyes.
    Narayanan D, Cheng H, Tang RA, Frishman LJ.
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2015 Feb 04; 130(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 25351235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Multifocal visual-evoked potential in unilateral compressive optic neuropathy.
    Semela L, Yang EB, Hedges TR, Vuong L, Odel JG, Hood DC.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr 04; 91(4):445-8. PubMed ID: 17077118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.