These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
592 related items for PubMed ID: 22105107
21. Impact of diabetes on the outcomes of cervical laminoplasty: a prospective cohort study of more than 500 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Machino M, Yukawa Y, Ito K, Inoue T, Kobayakawa A, Matsumoto T, Ouchida J, Tomita K, Kato F. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb 01; 39(3):220-7. PubMed ID: 24173020 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. A Clinical Prediction Rule for Functional Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Analysis of an International Prospective Multicenter Data Set of 757 Subjects. Tetreault L, Kopjar B, Côté P, Arnold P, Fehlings MG. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Dec 16; 97(24):2038-46. PubMed ID: 26677238 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of hinge position on the effectiveness of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Xia Y, Xia Y, Shen Q, Li H, Xu T. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Dec 16; 24(8):514-20. PubMed ID: 21336170 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Skip laminectomy and laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study of clinical and radiologic outcomes. Sivaraman A, Bhadra AK, Altaf F, Singh A, Rai A, Casey AT, Crawford RJ. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr 16; 23(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 20084024 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Electrophysiological evidence of functional improvement in the corticospinal tract after laminoplasty in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy: clinical article. Nakanishi K, Tanaka N, Kamei N, Ohta R, Fujioka Y, Hiramatsu T, Ujigo S, Ochi M. J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug 16; 21(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 24855997 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Prospective cohort study of mild cervical spondylotic myelopathy without surgical treatment. Sumi M, Miyamoto H, Suzuki T, Kaneyama S, Kanatani T, Uno K. J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan 16; 16(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 21981274 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Expansive open-door laminoplasty and selective anterior cervical decompression and fusion for treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Liu XY, Yuan SM, Tian YH, Zheng YP, Li JM. Orthop Surg; 2011 Aug 16; 3(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 22009646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Centerpiece plating in the cervical single open-door laminoplasty]. Wu ZW, Ren SJ, Sheng XY, Li SQ, Zhu KJ, He DW. Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2013 Mar 16; 26(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 23795450 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Cervical laminoplasty as a management option for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a series of 40 patients. Petraglia AL, Srinivasan V, Coriddi M, Whitbeck MG, Maxwell JT, Silberstein HJ. Neurosurgery; 2010 Aug 16; 67(2):272-7. PubMed ID: 20644412 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Recovery process following cervical laminoplasty in patients with cervical compression myelopathy: prospective cohort study. Suzuki A, Misawa H, Simogata M, Tsutsumimoto T, Takaoka K, Nakamura H. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec 15; 34(26):2874-9. PubMed ID: 19949366 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Microendoscopic laminotomy versus conventional laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: 5-year follow-up study. Minamide A, Yoshida M, Simpson AK, Yamada H, Hashizume H, Nakagawa Y, Iwasaki H, Tsutsui S, Okada M, Takami M, Nakao SI. J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct 15; 27(4):403-409. PubMed ID: 28708041 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Is there a difference in range of motion, neck pain, and outcomes in patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament versus those with cervical spondylosis, treated with plated laminoplasty? Fujimori T, Le H, Ziewacz JE, Chou D, Mummaneni PV. Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Jul 15; 35(1):E9. PubMed ID: 23815254 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Results of skip laminectomy-minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty. Shiraishi T, Fukuda K, Yato Y, Nakamura M, Ikegami T. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Dec 15; 28(24):2667-72. PubMed ID: 14673367 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Surgical outcomes of laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in very elderly patients (older than 80 years): Time from symptom onset to surgery and changes in spinal cord signal intensity on MRI. Notani N, Miyazaki M, Kanezaki S, Ishihara T, Tsumura H. Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2017 Sep 15; 160():78-82. PubMed ID: 28692908 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty. Masaki Y, Yamazaki M, Okawa A, Aramomi M, Hashimoto M, Koda M, Mochizuki M, Moriya H. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb 15; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 17285045 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The prevalence of pre- and postoperative symptoms in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by cervical laminoplasty. Machino M, Yukawa Y, Hida T, Ito K, Nakashima H, Kanbara S, Morita D, Kato F. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct 15; 37(22):E1383-8. PubMed ID: 22789979 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy: a cost and outcome comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and lateral mass fusion. Highsmith JM, Dhall SS, Haid RW, Rodts GE, Mummaneni PV. J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May 15; 14(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 21388285 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]