These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


112 related items for PubMed ID: 22108351

  • 1. Implications of interocular suppression in the treatment of amblyopia.
    Wong AM.
    J AAPOS; 2011 Oct; 15(5):417-8. PubMed ID: 22108351
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Excitatory binocular interactions in two cases of alternating strabismus.
    Goodman LK, Black JM, Phillips G, Hess RF, Thompson B.
    J AAPOS; 2011 Aug; 15(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 21907116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Relating binocular and monocular vision in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia.
    Agrawal R, Conner IP, Odom JV, Schwartz TL, Mendola JD.
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Jun; 124(6):844-50. PubMed ID: 16769838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Monocular Perceptual Deprivation from Interocular Suppression Temporarily Imbalances Ocular Dominance.
    Kim HW, Kim CY, Blake R.
    Curr Biol; 2017 Mar 20; 27(6):884-889. PubMed ID: 28262490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Impaired spatial and binocular summation for motion direction discrimination in strabismic amblyopia.
    Thompson B, Richard A, Churan J, Hess RF, Aaen-Stockdale C, Pack CC.
    Vision Res; 2011 Mar 25; 51(6):577-84. PubMed ID: 21300079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [The size of cells providing interhemispheric and intrahemispheric connections in the visual cortex of binocular vision-impaired cats].
    Alekseenko SV, Toporova SN, Shkorbatova PIu.
    Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 2011 Mar 25; 97(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 21675205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The magnitude and dynamics of interocular suppression affected by monocular boundary contour and conflicting local features.
    Su YR, He ZJ, Ooi TL.
    Vision Res; 2010 Sep 24; 50(20):2037-47. PubMed ID: 20624411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A reduced motion aftereffect in strabismic amblyopia.
    Hess RF, Demanins R, Bex PJ.
    Vision Res; 1997 May 24; 37(10):1303-11. PubMed ID: 9205722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A binocular rivalry study of motion perception in the human brain.
    Moutoussis K, Keliris G, Kourtzi Z, Logothetis N.
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug 24; 45(17):2231-43. PubMed ID: 15924938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Center-surround velocity-based segmentation: Speed, eccentricity, and timing of visual stimuli interact to determine interocular dominance.
    Ananyev E, Yong Z, Hsieh PJ.
    J Vis; 2019 Nov 01; 19(13):3. PubMed ID: 31689716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.