These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

140 related items for PubMed ID: 22109382

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization method: its utility and reliability.
    Matsumura M, Ota T, Takeshima N, Takizawa K.
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Aug; 20(6):1025-30. PubMed ID: 20683412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Association of menopause, aging and treatment procedures with positive margins after therapeutic cervical conization for CIN 3: a retrospective study of 8,856 patients by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
    Ikeda M, Mikami M, Yasaka M, Enomoto T, Kobayashi Y, Nagase S, Yokoyama M, Katabuchi H.
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Sep; 32(5):e68. PubMed ID: 34132067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
    Maluf PJ, Adad SJ, Murta EF.
    Tumori; 2004 Sep; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Conservative management of stage IA1 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with positive resection margins after conization.
    Kim WY, Chang SJ, Chang KH, Yoo SC, Ryu HS.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 May; 109(2):110-2. PubMed ID: 20096835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.
    Alder S, Megyessi D, Sundström K, Östensson E, Mints M, Belkić K, Arbyn M, Andersson S.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Repeat surgery in patients with cervical cancer stage FIGO IA1: a series of 156 cases and a review of the literature.
    Hefler LA, Polterauer S, Schneitter A, Concin N, Hofstetter G, Bentz E, Leipold H, Tempfer C, Reinthaller A.
    Anticancer Res; 2010 Feb; 30(2):565-8. PubMed ID: 20332471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The efficacy of cervical conization in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-positive women.
    Holcomb K, Matthews RP, Chapman JE, Abulafia O, Lee YC, Borges A, Buhl A.
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Sep; 74(3):428-31. PubMed ID: 10479504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term outcome after cold-knife conization with clear margins.
    Reich O, Pickel H, Lahousen M, Tamussino K, Winter R.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Mar; 97(3):428-30. PubMed ID: 11239650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.