These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

119 related items for PubMed ID: 22122354

  • 1. Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: a multi-center study.
    Jansen S, Luts H, Wagener KC, Kollmeier B, Del Rio M, Dauman R, James C, Fraysse B, Vormès E, Frachet B, Wouters J, van Wieringen A.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Mar; 51(3):164-73. PubMed ID: 22122354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The French digit triplet test: a hearing screening tool for speech intelligibility in noise.
    Jansen S, Luts H, Wagener KC, Frachet B, Wouters J.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 May; 49(5):378-87. PubMed ID: 20380611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise.
    Hochmuth S, Brand T, Zokoll MA, Castro FZ, Wardenga N, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):536-44. PubMed ID: 22537033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The development and evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment.
    Dietz A, Buschermöhle M, Aarnisalo AA, Vanhanen A, Hyyrynen T, Aaltonen O, Löppönen H, Zokoll MA, Kollmeier B.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Jul; 134(7):728-37. PubMed ID: 24807850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Establishment of age-specific normative data for the canadian French version of the hearing in noise test for children.
    Vaillancourt V, Laroche C, Giguère C, Soli SD.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 18349705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S, Dillon H.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Prediction of the intelligibility for speech in real-life background noises for subjects with normal hearing.
    Rhebergen KS, Versfeld NJ, Dreschler WA.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 18490862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
    Ozimek E, Warzybok A, Kutzner D.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984 Jun; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH, Humes LE, Amos NE, Strauser LE.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Internationally comparable screening tests for listening in noise in several European languages: the German digit triplet test as an optimization prototype.
    Zokoll MA, Wagener KC, Brand T, Buschermöhle M, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):697-707. PubMed ID: 22762202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Modelling the speech reception threshold in non-stationary noise in hearing-impaired listeners as a function of level.
    Rhebergen KS, Versfeld NJ, de Laat JA, Dreschler WA.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Nov; 49(11):856-65. PubMed ID: 20936997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. New measures of masked text recognition in relation to speech-in-noise perception and their associations with age and cognitive abilities.
    Besser J, Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Rönnberg J, Festen JM.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 55(1):194-209. PubMed ID: 22199191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA, Rudner M, Johnsrude IS, Festen JM, van Beek JH, Rönnberg J.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. How much does language proficiency by non-native listeners influence speech audiometric tests in noise?
    Warzybok A, Brand T, Wagener KC, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb; 54 Suppl 2():88-99. PubMed ID: 26344170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Polish sentence tests for measuring the intelligibility of speech in interfering noise.
    Ozimek E, Kutzner D, Sek A, Wicher A.
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Feb; 48(7):433-43. PubMed ID: 19925330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.