These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

189 related items for PubMed ID: 22146833

  • 21. Initial experience with a handheld device digital imaging and communications in medicine viewer: OsiriX mobile on the iPhone.
    Choudhri AF, Radvany MG.
    J Digit Imaging; 2011 Apr; 24(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 20567992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Diagnostic Performance of US for Differentiating Perforated from Nonperforated Pediatric Appendicitis: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Carpenter JL, Orth RC, Zhang W, Lopez ME, Mangona KL, Guillerman RP.
    Radiology; 2017 Mar; 282(3):835-841. PubMed ID: 27797677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. A new technique for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: abdominal CT with compression to the right lower quadrant.
    Kılınçer A, Akpınar E, Erbil B, Ünal E, Karaosmanoğlu AD, Kaynaroğlu V, Akata D, Özmen M.
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Aug; 27(8):3317-3325. PubMed ID: 28116514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Use of Computed Tomography to Determine Perforation in Patients With Acute Appendicitis.
    Gaskill CE, Simianu VV, Carnell J, Hippe DS, Bhargava P, Flum DR, Davidson GH.
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2018 Aug; 47(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 28162864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. MRI of suspected appendicitis during pregnancy: interradiologist agreement, indeterminate interpretation and the meaning of non-visualization of the appendix.
    Tsai R, Raptis C, Fowler KJ, Owen JW, Mellnick VM.
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 90(1079):20170383. PubMed ID: 28869395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. New CT criterion for acute appendicitis: maximum depth of intraluminal appendiceal fluid.
    Moteki T, Horikoshi H.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 May; 188(5):1313-9. PubMed ID: 17449776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Retrospective study of 24 cases of acute appendiceal diverticulitis: CT findings and pathological correlations.
    Yardimci AH, Bektas CT, Pasaoglu E, Kinaci E, Ozer C, Sevinc MM, Mahmutoglu AS, Kilickesmez O.
    Jpn J Radiol; 2017 May; 35(5):225-232. PubMed ID: 28247217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The nonvisualized appendix: incidence of acute appendicitis when secondary inflammatory changes are absent.
    Nikolaidis P, Hwang CM, Miller FH, Papanicolaou N.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Oct; 183(4):889-92. PubMed ID: 15385277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The challenging ultrasound diagnosis of perforated appendicitis in children: constellations of sonographic findings improve specificity.
    Tulin-Silver S, Babb J, Pinkney L, Strubel N, Lala S, Milla SS, Tomita S, Fefferman NR.
    Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Jun; 45(6):820-30. PubMed ID: 25471754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Acute appendicitis of the appendiceal stump.
    Aschkenasy MT, Rybicki FJ.
    J Emerg Med; 2005 Jan; 28(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 15657003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Ascending retrocecal appendicitis: clinical and computed tomographic findings.
    Kim S, Lim HK, Lee JY, Lee J, Kim MJ, Lee AS.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2006 Jan; 30(5):772-6. PubMed ID: 16954926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Unenhanced spiral CT for evaluating acute appendicitis in daily routine. A prospective study.
    Pickuth D, Spielmann RP.
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2001 Jan; 48(37):140-2. PubMed ID: 11268950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Perforated versus nonperforated acute appendicitis: accuracy of multidetector CT detection.
    Bixby SD, Lucey BC, Soto JA, Theysohn JM, Ozonoff A, Varghese JC.
    Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):780-6. PubMed ID: 17114626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Diagnosis of appendiceal abscess in children with acute appendicitis: value of color Doppler sonography.
    Quillin SP, Siegel MJ.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1251-4. PubMed ID: 7717241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Diagnostic accuracy of an iPhone DICOM viewer for the interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee.
    De Maio P, White LM, Bleakney R, Menezes RJ, Theodoropoulos J.
    Clin J Sport Med; 2014 Jul; 24(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 24284945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Relative CT number of periappendiceal fat stranding may be an applicable index for estimating the severity of acute appendicitis.
    Song X, Shi M, Liu W, Ge Y, Wang P.
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Apr 01; 94(1120):20200437. PubMed ID: 33684313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Diagnostic accuracy of focused appendiceal CT in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitis.
    Wijetunga R, Tan BS, Rouse JC, Bigg-Wither GW, Doust BD.
    Radiology; 2001 Dec 01; 221(3):747-53. PubMed ID: 11719671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. A smartphone client-server teleradiology system for primary diagnosis of acute stroke.
    Mitchell JR, Sharma P, Modi J, Simpson M, Thomas M, Hill MD, Goyal M.
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 May 06; 13(2):e31. PubMed ID: 21550961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Incidence of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal CT findings.
    Daly CP, Cohan RH, Francis IR, Caoili EM, Ellis JH, Nan B.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun 06; 184(6):1813-20. PubMed ID: 15908536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Value of bone window settings on CT for revealing appendicoliths in patients with appendicitis.
    Alobaidi M, Shirkhoda A.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jan 06; 180(1):201-5. PubMed ID: 12490503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.