These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

426 related items for PubMed ID: 22154672

  • 1. [Outcome of embryo vitrification compared to slow freezing process at early cleavage stages. Report of the first French birth].
    Sifer C, Sermondade N, Dupont C, Poncelet C, Cédrin-Durnerin I, Hugues JN, Benzacken B, Levy R.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Mar; 40(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22154672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Contribution of embryo vitrification procedure to ART efficiency].
    Sifer C.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Oct; 42(10):721-4. PubMed ID: 25192924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Slow freezing should not be totally substituted by vitrification when applied to day 3 embryo cryopreservation: an analysis of 5613 frozen cycles.
    Zhu HY, Xue YM, Yang LY, Jiang LY, Ling C, Tong XM, Zhang SY.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Sep; 32(9):1371-7. PubMed ID: 26238389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: a RCT.
    Debrock S, Peeraer K, Fernandez Gallardo E, De Neubourg D, Spiessens C, D'Hooghe TM.
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1820-30. PubMed ID: 26089301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The impact of two different thaw protocols on outcomes of vitrified cleavage-stage embryos transfer.
    Zhang XJ, Yang YZ, Lv Q, Wang Y, Cao XH, Li XJ, Liao MX, Guo C.
    Cryo Letters; 2012 Aug; 33(6):411-7. PubMed ID: 23250400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human Day 3 embryos.
    Van Landuyt L, Van de Velde H, De Vos A, Haentjens P, Blockeel C, Tournaye H, Verheyen G.
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):2943-9. PubMed ID: 24014599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Outcomes of vitrified-warmed day-4 embryos after day-3 cleavage-stage biopsy.
    Kahraman S, Candan ZN.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov; 21(5):636-41. PubMed ID: 20920891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Effects of cryopreservation time and thawing method of human oocyte vitrification on the outcome of assisted reproduction].
    Song WY, Sun YP, Jin HX, Xin ZM, Su YC, Guo YH, Chen ZJ.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Aug; 45(8):578-82. PubMed ID: 21029612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos.
    Liu SY, Teng B, Fu J, Li X, Zheng Y, Sun XX.
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2093-100. PubMed ID: 23569081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of day 3 embryo morphometrics and morphokinetics on survival and implantation after slow freezing-thawing and after vitrification-warming: a retrospective cohort study.
    Fernandez Gallardo E, Spiessens C, D'Hooghe T, Debrock S.
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2017 Oct 03; 15(1):79. PubMed ID: 28974230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The freezing method of cleavage stage embryos has no impact on the weight of the newborns.
    Kaartinen N, Kananen K, Huhtala H, Keränen S, Tinkanen H.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Mar 03; 33(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 26749388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Outcomes of vitrified early cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles.
    Cobo A, de los Santos MJ, Castellò D, Gámiz P, Campos P, Remohí J.
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Nov 03; 98(5):1138-46.e1. PubMed ID: 22862909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Perinatal outcomes of singletons following vitrification versus slow-freezing of embryos: a multicenter cohort study using propensity score analysis.
    Gu F, Li S, Zheng L, Gu J, Li T, Du H, Gao C, Ding C, Quan S, Zhou C, Li P, Xu Y.
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep 29; 34(9):1788-1798. PubMed ID: 31407797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Comparison of vitrification and slow-freezing of human day 3 cleavage stage embryos: post-vitrification development and pregnancy outcomes].
    Li Y, Chen ZJ, Yang HJ, Zhong WX, Ma SY, Li M.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Nov 29; 42(11):753-5. PubMed ID: 18307902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The effect of modified quarter laser-assisted zona thinning on the implantation rate per embryo in frozen/vitrified-thawed/warmed embryo transfer cycles: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Debrock S, Peeraer K, Spiessens C, Willemen D, De Loecker P, D'Hooghe TM.
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Aug 29; 26(8):1997-2007. PubMed ID: 21659315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Analysis of embryo intactness and developmental potential following slow freezing and vitrification.
    Yu L, Jia C, Lan Y, Song R, Zhou L, Li Y, Liang Y, Wang S.
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2017 Oct 29; 63(5):285-293. PubMed ID: 28795845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.
    Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, Vanderpoel S, Racowsky C.
    Hum Reprod Update; 2017 Mar 01; 23(2):139-155. PubMed ID: 27827818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Comparison of frozen embryo transfer outcomes at blastocyst stage according to freezing method and type of endometrial preparation].
    Pouget O, Scalici E, Hoa-Ferrieres A, Deutsch-Bringer S, Gala A, Dechaud H, Hamamah S.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Mar 01; 43(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 25708846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.