These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
267 related items for PubMed ID: 22173573
1. Identification and validity of accelerometer cut-points for toddlers. Trost SG, Fees BS, Haar SJ, Murray AD, Crowe LK. Obesity (Silver Spring); 2012 Nov; 20(11):2317-9. PubMed ID: 22173573 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Calibration and comparison of accelerometer cut points in preschool children. van Cauwenberghe E, Labarque V, Trost SG, de Bourdeaudhuij I, Cardon G. Int J Pediatr Obes; 2011 Jun; 6(2-2):e582-9. PubMed ID: 21121867 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Calibration and validation of the ActiGraph GT3X+ in 2-3 year olds. Costa S, Barber SE, Cameron N, Clemes SA. J Sci Med Sport; 2014 Nov; 17(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 24365695 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility and validity of accelerometer measurements to assess physical activity in toddlers. Van Cauwenberghe E, Gubbels J, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Cardon G. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2011 Jun 26; 8():67. PubMed ID: 21703004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Calibration of ActiGraph GT3X, Actical and RT3 accelerometers in adolescents. Romanzini M, Petroski EL, Ohara D, Dourado AC, Reichert FF. Eur J Sport Sci; 2014 Jun 26; 14(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 24533499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of intensity-based cut-points for the RT3 accelerometer in youth. Joschtel BJ, Trost SG. J Sci Med Sport; 2014 Sep 26; 17(5):501-5. PubMed ID: 24262335 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Calibration and Cross-Validation of the ActiGraph wGT3X+ Accelerometer for the Estimation of Physical Activity Intensity in Children with Intellectual Disabilities. McGarty AM, Penpraze V, Melville CA. PLoS One; 2016 Sep 26; 11(10):e0164928. PubMed ID: 27760219 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Discrepancies in accelerometer-measured physical activity in children due to cut-point non-equivalence and placement site. Routen AC, Upton D, Edwards MG, Peters DM. J Sports Sci; 2012 Sep 26; 30(12):1303-10. PubMed ID: 22856351 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of accelerometer cut points in toddlers with and without cerebral palsy. Oftedal S, Bell KL, Davies PS, Ware RS, Boyd RN. Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Sep 26; 46(9):1808-15. PubMed ID: 25134003 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Convergent validity of four accelerometer cutpoints with direct observation of preschool children's outdoor physical activity. Kahan D, Nicaise V, Reuben K. Res Q Exerc Sport; 2013 Mar 26; 84(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 23611009 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of ActiGraph GT3X+ and Actical accelerometer data in 9-11-year-old Canadian children. Borghese MM, Tremblay MS, LeBlanc AG, Leduc G, Boyer C, Chaput JP. J Sports Sci; 2017 Mar 26; 35(6):517-524. PubMed ID: 27103499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Children's physical activity assessed with wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers. Rowlands AV, Rennie K, Kozarski R, Stanley RM, Eston RG, Parfitt GC, Olds TS. Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Dec 26; 46(12):2308-16. PubMed ID: 24781890 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. ActiGraph GT3X+ cut-points for identifying sedentary behaviour in older adults in free-living environments. Aguilar-Farías N, Brown WJ, Peeters GM. J Sci Med Sport; 2014 May 26; 17(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 23932934 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Toddler physical activity study: laboratory and community studies to evaluate accelerometer validity and correlates. Hager ER, Gormley CE, Latta LW, Treuth MS, Caulfield LE, Black MM. BMC Public Health; 2016 Sep 06; 16(1):936. PubMed ID: 27600404 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility and validity of the ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer in measuring physical activity of Malawian toddlers. Pulakka A, Cheung YB, Ashorn U, Penpraze V, Maleta K, Phuka JC, Ashorn P. Acta Paediatr; 2013 Dec 06; 102(12):1192-8. PubMed ID: 24102811 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Device-based measurement of physical activity in pre-schoolers: Comparison of machine learning and cut point methods. Ahmadi MN, Trost SG. PLoS One; 2022 Dec 06; 17(4):e0266970. PubMed ID: 35417492 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Daily movement patterns and biological markers among adults in the United States. Loprinzi PD, Lee H, Cardinal BJ. Prev Med; 2014 Mar 06; 60():128-30. PubMed ID: 24374055 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Intensity classification accuracy of accelerometer-measured physical activities in Chinese children and youth. Zhu Z, Chen P, Zhuang J. Res Q Exerc Sport; 2013 Dec 06; 84 Suppl 2():S4-11. PubMed ID: 24527562 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrepancies between methods of identifying objectively determined physical activity. Ham SA, Reis JP, Strath SJ, Dubose KD, Ainsworth BE. Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Jan 06; 39(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 17218884 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]