These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

91 related items for PubMed ID: 22174278

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Generic workflow for quality assessment of quantitative label-free LC-MS analysis.
    Sandin M, Krogh M, Hansson K, Levander F.
    Proteomics; 2011 Mar; 11(6):1114-24. PubMed ID: 21298787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Optimization of Statistical Methods Impact on Quantitative Proteomics Data.
    Pursiheimo A, Vehmas AP, Afzal S, Suomi T, Chand T, Strauss L, Poutanen M, Rokka A, Corthals GL, Elo LL.
    J Proteome Res; 2015 Oct 02; 14(10):4118-26. PubMed ID: 26321463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Statistical identification of differentially labeled peptides from liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
    Cho H, Smalley DM, Theodorescu D, Ley K, Lee JK.
    Proteomics; 2007 Oct 02; 7(20):3681-92. PubMed ID: 17879999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A comparison of MS2-based label-free quantitative proteomic techniques with regards to accuracy and precision.
    Colaert N, Vandekerckhove J, Gevaert K, Martens L.
    Proteomics; 2011 Mar 02; 11(6):1110-3. PubMed ID: 21365758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Simulating and validating proteomics data and search results.
    Geromanos SJ, Hughes C, Golick D, Ciavarini S, Gorenstein MV, Richardson K, Hoyes JB, Vissers JP, Langridge JI.
    Proteomics; 2011 Mar 02; 11(6):1189-211. PubMed ID: 21298790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Understanding the improved sensitivity of spectral library searching over sequence database searching in proteomics data analysis.
    Zhang X, Li Y, Shao W, Lam H.
    Proteomics; 2011 Mar 02; 11(6):1075-85. PubMed ID: 21298786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Proteomics-grade de novo sequencing approach.
    Savitski MM, Nielsen ML, Kjeldsen F, Zubarev RA.
    J Proteome Res; 2005 Mar 02; 4(6):2348-54. PubMed ID: 16335984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. De novo sequencing methods in proteomics.
    Hughes C, Ma B, Lajoie GA.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010 Mar 02; 604():105-21. PubMed ID: 20013367
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Expanding the organismal scope of proteomics: cross-species protein identification by mass spectrometry and its implications.
    Liska AJ, Shevchenko A.
    Proteomics; 2003 Jan 02; 3(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 12548630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.