These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
91 related items for PubMed ID: 22174278
21. Mass spectrometry for protein quantification in biomarker discovery. Wang M, You J. Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 815():199-225. PubMed ID: 22130994 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. BuildSummary: using a group-based approach to improve the sensitivity of peptide/protein identification in shotgun proteomics. Sheng Q, Dai J, Wu Y, Tang H, Zeng R. J Proteome Res; 2012 Mar 02; 11(3):1494-502. PubMed ID: 22217156 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. MSNovo: a dynamic programming algorithm for de novo peptide sequencing via tandem mass spectrometry. Mo L, Dutta D, Wan Y, Chen T. Anal Chem; 2007 Jul 01; 79(13):4870-8. PubMed ID: 17550227 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A global analysis of peptide fragmentation variability. Barsnes H, Eidhammer I, Martens L. Proteomics; 2011 Mar 01; 11(6):1181-8. PubMed ID: 21328539 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Statistical Evaluation of Labeled Comparative Profiling Proteomics Experiments Using Permutation Test. Nguyen HD, McLachlan GJ, Hill MM. Methods Mol Biol; 2017 Mar 01; 1549():109-117. PubMed ID: 27975287 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Spectral probabilities and generating functions of tandem mass spectra: a strike against decoy databases. Kim S, Gupta N, Pevzner PA. J Proteome Res; 2008 Aug 01; 7(8):3354-63. PubMed ID: 18597511 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. VEMS 3.0: algorithms and computational tools for tandem mass spectrometry based identification of post-translational modifications in proteins. Matthiesen R, Trelle MB, Højrup P, Bunkenborg J, Jensen ON. J Proteome Res; 2005 Aug 01; 4(6):2338-47. PubMed ID: 16335983 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Which metaproteome? The impact of protein extraction bias on metaproteomic analyses. Leary DH, Hervey WJ, Deschamps JR, Kusterbeck AW, Vora GJ. Mol Cell Probes; 2013 Aug 01; 27(5-6):193-9. PubMed ID: 23831146 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The good, the bad, the ugly: validating the mass spectrometric analysis of modified peptides. Beck F, Lewandrowski U, Wiltfang M, Feldmann I, Geiger J, Sickmann A, Zahedi RP. Proteomics; 2011 Mar 01; 11(6):1099-109. PubMed ID: 21298789 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. A hybrid method for peptide identification using integer linear optimization, local database search, and quadrupole time-of-flight or OrbiTrap tandem mass spectrometry. DiMaggio PA, Floudas CA, Lu B, Yates JR. J Proteome Res; 2008 Apr 01; 7(4):1584-93. PubMed ID: 18324765 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Computational approaches to peptide identification via tandem MS. Hubbard SJ. Methods Mol Biol; 2010 Apr 01; 604():23-42. PubMed ID: 20013362 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. In vivo quantitative proteome profiling: planning and evaluation of SILAC experiments. Kirchner M, Selbach M. Methods Mol Biol; 2012 Apr 01; 893():175-99. PubMed ID: 22665302 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Large improvements in MS/MS-based peptide identification rates using a hybrid analysis. Cannon WR, Rawlins MM, Baxter DJ, Callister SJ, Lipton MS, Bryant DA. J Proteome Res; 2011 May 06; 10(5):2306-17. PubMed ID: 21391700 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Search and decoy: the automatic identification of mass spectra. Eisenacher M, Kohl M, Turewicz M, Koch MH, Uszkoreit J, Stephan C. Methods Mol Biol; 2012 May 06; 893():445-88. PubMed ID: 22665317 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Genome annotation of Anopheles gambiae using mass spectrometry-derived data. Kalume DE, Peri S, Reddy R, Zhong J, Okulate M, Kumar N, Pandey A. BMC Genomics; 2005 Sep 19; 6():128. PubMed ID: 16171517 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. MassWiz: a novel scoring algorithm with target-decoy based analysis pipeline for tandem mass spectrometry. Yadav AK, Kumar D, Dash D. J Proteome Res; 2011 May 06; 10(5):2154-60. PubMed ID: 21417338 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A stringent approach to improve the quality of nitrotyrosine peptide identifications. Ghesquière B, Helsens K, Vandekerckhove J, Gevaert K. Proteomics; 2011 Mar 06; 11(6):1094-8. PubMed ID: 21298788 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A workflow to increase the detection rate of proteins from unsequenced organisms in high-throughput proteomics experiments. Grossmann J, Fischer B, Baerenfaller K, Owiti J, Buhmann JM, Gruissem W, Baginsky S. Proteomics; 2007 Dec 06; 7(23):4245-54. PubMed ID: 18040981 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Metaproteomic analysis of a bacterial community response to cadmium exposure. Lacerda CM, Choe LH, Reardon KF. J Proteome Res; 2007 Mar 06; 6(3):1145-52. PubMed ID: 17284062 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Computational methods for the comparative quantification of proteins in label-free LCn-MS experiments. Wong JW, Sullivan MJ, Cagney G. Brief Bioinform; 2008 Mar 06; 9(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 17905794 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]