These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
166 related items for PubMed ID: 22183192
1. Evaluating the efficacy of remediation for struggling readers in high school. Lovett MW, Lacerenza L, De Palma M, Frijters JC. J Learn Disabil; 2012; 45(2):151-69. PubMed ID: 22183192 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Putting struggling readers on the PHAST track: a program to integrate phonological and strategy-based remedial reading instruction and maximize outcomes. Lovett MW, Lacerenza L, Borden SL. J Learn Disabil; 2000; 33(5):458-76. PubMed ID: 15495548 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Replication of an Experimental Study Investigating the Efficacy of a Multisyllabic Word Reading Intervention With and Without Motivational Beliefs Training for Struggling Readers. Toste JR, Capin P, Williams KJ, Cho E, Vaughn S. J Learn Disabil; 2019; 52(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 29771184 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the Impact of a Multistrategy Inference Intervention for Middle-Grade Struggling Readers. Barth AE, Elleman A. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2017 Jan 01; 48(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 27776201 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of a Word- and Text-Based Intervention for Students With Significant Reading Difficulties. Vaughn S, Roberts GJ, Miciak J, Taylor P, Fletcher JM. J Learn Disabil; 2019 Jan 01; 52(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 29792081 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Computerized trainings in four groups of struggling readers: Specific effects on word reading and comprehension. Potocki A, Magnan A, Ecalle J. Res Dev Disabil; 2015 Jan 01; 45-46():83-92. PubMed ID: 26233762 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the benefits of assistive reading software: perceptions of high school students with learning disabilities. Chiang HY, Liu CH. Assist Technol; 2011 Jan 01; 23(4):199-204. PubMed ID: 22256668 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reading research for students with LD: a meta-analysis of intervention outcomes. Swanson HL. J Learn Disabil; 1999 Jan 01; 32(6):504-32. PubMed ID: 15510440 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-assisted remedial reading intervention for school beginners at risk for reading disability. Saine NL, Lerkkanen MK, Ahonen T, Tolvanen A, Lyytinen H. Child Dev; 2011 Jan 01; 82(3):1013-28. PubMed ID: 21418055 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of two reading interventions for children with reading disabilities. O'Shaughnessy TE, Swanson HL. J Learn Disabil; 2000 Jan 01; 33(3):257-77. PubMed ID: 15505964 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Examining Predictive Validity of Oral Reading Fluency Slope in Upper Elementary Grades Using Quantile Regression. Cho E, Capin P, Roberts G, Vaughn S. J Learn Disabil; 2018 Jan 01; 51(6):565-577. PubMed ID: 28758526 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Teaching students with reading difficulties to be close readers: a feasibility study. Katz LA, Carlisle JF. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2009 Jul 01; 40(3):325-40. PubMed ID: 19564445 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Longitudinal outcomes of an individualized and intensive reading intervention for third grade students. Partanen M, Siegel LS, Giaschi DE. Dyslexia; 2019 Aug 01; 25(3):227-245. PubMed ID: 31020760 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]