These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

276 related items for PubMed ID: 22197733

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: image quality assessment in the cervicothoracic region.
    Katsura M, Sato J, Akahane M, Matsuda I, Ishida M, Yasaka K, Kunimatsu A, Ohtomo K.
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):356-60. PubMed ID: 23199752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. CT of the pancreas: comparison of image quality and pancreatic duct depiction among model-based iterative, adaptive statistical iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Lin XZ, Machida H, Tanaka I, Fukui R, Ueno E, Chen KM, Yan FH.
    Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 24496703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
    Shuman WP, Chan KT, Busey JM, Mitsumori LM, Choi E, Koprowicz KM, Kanal KM.
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Iterative Image Reconstruction Improves the Accuracy of Automated Plaque Burden Assessment in Coronary CT Angiography: A Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound.
    Puchner SB, Ferencik M, Maehara A, Stolzmann P, Ma S, Do S, Kauczor HU, Mintz GS, Hoffmann U, Schlett CL.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Apr; 208(4):777-784. PubMed ID: 28177655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
    Singh S, Kalra MK, Do S, Thibault JB, Pien H, O'Connor OJ, Blake MA.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012 Apr; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality.
    Yanagawa M, Gyobu T, Leung AN, Kawai M, Kawata Y, Sumikawa H, Honda O, Tomiyama N.
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 24713541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.