These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


252 related items for PubMed ID: 22215451

  • 1. Spectral and temporal measures in hybrid cochlear implant users: on the mechanism of electroacoustic hearing benefits.
    Golub JS, Won JH, Drennan WR, Worman TD, Rubinstein JT.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Feb; 33(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 22215451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Psychoacoustic abilities associated with music perception in cochlear implant users.
    Won JH, Drennan WR, Kang RS, Rubinstein JT.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):796-805. PubMed ID: 20595901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Psychoacoustic performance and music and speech perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
    Jung KH, Won JH, Drennan WR, Jameyson E, Miyasaki G, Norton SJ, Rubinstein JT.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012 Dec; 17(3):189-97. PubMed ID: 22398954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB, Won JH, Moon IJ.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Dec; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Music and psychoacoustic perception abilities in cochlear implant users with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.
    Yüksel M, Çiprut A.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Apr; 131():109865. PubMed ID: 31945735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Nonlinguistic Outcome Measures in Adult Cochlear Implant Users Over the First Year of Implantation.
    Drennan WR, Won JH, Timme AO, Rubinstein JT.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Apr; 37(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 26656317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification.
    Cullington HE, Zeng FG.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 21178567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
    Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, Lowder MW.
    Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.
    Gfeller K, Turner C, Oleson J, Zhang X, Gantz B, Froman R, Olszewski C.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 17485990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Music and lexical tone perception in Chinese adult cochlear implant users.
    Wang S, Liu B, Dong R, Zhou Y, Li J, Qi B, Chen X, Han D, Zhang L.
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Jun; 122(6):1353-60. PubMed ID: 22362607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effects of Low Frequency Residual Hearing on Music Perception and Psychoacoustic Abilities in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Yüksel M, Meredith MA, Rubinstein JT.
    Front Neurosci; 2019 Jun; 13():924. PubMed ID: 31551687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Combined electric and acoustic hearing performance with Zebra® speech processor: speech reception, place, and temporal coding evaluation.
    Vaerenberg B, Péan V, Lesbros G, De Ceulaer G, Schauwers K, Daemers K, Gnansia D, Govaerts PJ.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 23321588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Patient-Reported Outcomes From the United States Clinical Trial for a Hybrid Cochlear Implant.
    Kelsall DC, Arnold RJG, Lionnet L.
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Oct; 38(9):1251-1261. PubMed ID: 28777227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode.
    Cosetti MK, Friedmann DR, Zhu BZ, Heman-Ackah SE, Fang Y, Keller RG, Shapiro WH, Roland JT, Waltzman SB.
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 23449440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Kong YY, Cruz R, Jones JA, Zeng FG.
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 15064662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Listening Effort in Prelingual Cochlear Implant Recipients: Effects of Spectral and Temporal Auditory Processing and Contralateral Acoustic Hearing.
    Yüksel M, Taşdemir İ, Çiprut A.
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Dec 01; 43(10):e1077-e1084. PubMed ID: 36099588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.