These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

215 related items for PubMed ID: 22218873

  • 1. Optimal suture materials for contaminated gastrointestinal surgery: does infection influence the decrease of the tensile strength of sutures?
    Tanaka Y, Sadahiro S, Ishikawa K, Suzuki T, Kamijo A, Tazume S, Yasuda M.
    Surg Today; 2012 Dec; 42(12):1170-5. PubMed ID: 22218873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Optimal sutures for use in the abdomen: an evaluation based on the formation of adhesions and abscesses.
    Ishikawa K, Sadahiro S, Tanaka Y, Suzuki T, Kamijo A, Tazume S.
    Surg Today; 2013 Apr; 43(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 22797960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS.
    Bourne RB, Bitar H, Andreae PR, Martin LM, Finlay JB, Marquis F.
    Can J Surg; 1988 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2827875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Polydioxanone (PDS), a novel monofilament synthetic absorbable suture.
    Ray JA, Doddi N, Regula D, Williams JA, Melveger A.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Oct; 153(4):497-507. PubMed ID: 6792722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison between absorbable and nonabsorbable, monofilament sutures for end-to-end arterial anastomoses in growing pigs.
    Steen S, Andersson L, Löwenhielm P, Stridbeck H, Walther B, Holmin T.
    Surgery; 1984 Feb; 95(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 6420918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Breaking strength and diameter of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure in the rat.
    Outlaw KK, Vela AR, O'Leary JP.
    Am Surg; 1998 Apr; 64(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9544148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Behaviour of synthetic absorbable sutures with and without synergistic enteric infection.
    Kapadia CR, Mann JB, McGeehan D, Jose Biglin JE, Waxman BP, Dudley HA.
    Eur Surg Res; 1983 Apr; 15(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 6303792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Assessment of sutures for use in colonic surgery: an experimental study.
    Durdey P, Bucknall TE.
    J R Soc Med; 1984 Jun; 77(6):472-7. PubMed ID: 6429330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Reinforced poly(L-lactic acid) fibres as suture material.
    Lam KH, Nijenhuis AJ, Bartels H, Postema AR, Jonkman MF, Pennings AJ, Nieuwenhuis P.
    J Appl Biomater; 1995 Jun; 6(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 7492810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Abdominal wound closure. A comparison of polydioxanone, polypropylene, and Teflon-coated braided Dacron sutures.
    Kon ND, Meredith JW, Poole GV, Martin MB, Kawamoto E, Myers RT.
    Am Surg; 1984 Oct; 50(10):549-51. PubMed ID: 6237599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of Bacterial Colonization and Clinical Properties of Different Suture Materials in Dentoalveoler Surgery.
    Yaman D, Paksoy T, Ustaoğlu G, Demirci M.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Feb; 80(2):313-326. PubMed ID: 34673005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.