These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
274 related items for PubMed ID: 22222141
1. Influence of preparation and wall thickness on the resistance to fracture of zirconia implant abutments. Att W, Yajima ND, Wolkewitz M, Witkowski S, Strub JR. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e196-203. PubMed ID: 22222141 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study. Foong JK, Judge RB, Palamara JE, Swain MV. J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of implant abutment angulations on the fracture resistance of overlaying CAM-milled zirconia single crowns. Ellakwa A, Raj T, Deeb S, Ronaghi G, Martin FE, Klineberg I. Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 21623803 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments. Kolbeck C, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Handel G. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 18707604 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment. Protopapadaki M, Monaco EA, Kim HI, Davis EL. J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load. Kim JS, Raigrodski AJ, Flinn BD, Rubenstein JE, Chung KH, Mancl LA. J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD/CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments. Kim S, Kim HI, Brewer JD, Monaco EA. J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 19328275 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections. Sailer I, Sailer T, Stawarczyk B, Jung RE, Hämmerle CH. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Apr; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study. Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D, Güth JF, Erdelt K, Happe A, Beuer F. Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1215-20. PubMed ID: 23021964 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro performance of zirconia and titanium implant/abutment systems for anterior application. Rosentritt M, Hagemann A, Hahnel S, Behr M, Preis V. J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):1019-26. PubMed ID: 24699071 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems. Martínez-Rus F, Ferreiroa A, Özcan M, Bartolomé JF, Pradíes G. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Aug; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal adaptation of all-ceramic crowns on implant abutments. Att W, Hoischen T, Gerds T, Strub JR. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Dec; 10(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 18241217 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations after exposure to the artificial mouth. Att W, Kurun S, Gerds T, Strub JR. J Oral Rehabil; 2006 May; 33(5):380-6. PubMed ID: 16629897 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour. Larsson C. Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011 May; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]