These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

258 related items for PubMed ID: 22223890

  • 1. Speech perception with music maskers by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Eskridge EN, Galvin JJ, Aronoff JM, Li T, Fu QJ.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):800-10. PubMed ID: 22223890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Nelson PB, Jin SH, Carney AE, Nelson DA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):961-8. PubMed ID: 12597189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effect of fluctuating maskers on speech understanding of high-performing cochlear implant users.
    Zirn S, Polterauer D, Keller S, Hemmert W.
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Feb; 55(5):295-304. PubMed ID: 26865377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing.
    Fu QJ, Nogaki G.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Mar; 6(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 15735937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Xu K, Willis S, Gopen Q, Fu QJ.
    Ear Hear; 2020 Mar; 41(5):1362-1371. PubMed ID: 32132377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia.
    Cooper WB, Tobey E, Loizou PC.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):618-26. PubMed ID: 18469714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.
    Stickney GS, Zeng FG, Litovsky R, Assmann P.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1081-91. PubMed ID: 15376674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation.
    Hall JW, Buss E, Grose JH, Roush PA.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Aug; 33(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 22237164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comodulation masking release in speech identification with real and simulated cochlear-implant hearing.
    Ihlefeld A, Shinn-Cunningham BG, Carlyon RP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1315-24. PubMed ID: 22352505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Speech Understanding With Various Maskers in Cochlear-Implant and Simulated Cochlear-Implant Hearing: Effects of Spectral Resolution and Implications for Masking Release.
    Croghan NBH, Smith ZM.
    Trends Hear; 2018 Feb; 22():2331216518787276. PubMed ID: 30022730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Nelson PB, Jin SH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2286-94. PubMed ID: 15139640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The Effects of Musical Training on Speech Detection in the Presence of Informational and Energetic Masking.
    Morse-Fortier C, Parrish MM, Baran JA, Freyman RL.
    Trends Hear; 2017 May; 21():2331216517739427. PubMed ID: 29161982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.