These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

298 related items for PubMed ID: 22232125

  • 1. Computer visualizations: factors that influence spatial anatomy comprehension.
    Nguyen N, Nelson AJ, Wilson TD.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 22232125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. How spatial abilities and dynamic visualizations interplay when learning functional anatomy with 3D anatomical models.
    Berney S, Bétrancourt M, Molinari G, Hoyek N.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):452-62. PubMed ID: 25689057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. "Let's get physical": advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy.
    Preece D, Williams SB, Lam R, Weller R.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(4):216-24. PubMed ID: 23349117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The relative effectiveness of computer-based and traditional resources for education in anatomy.
    Khot Z, Quinlan K, Norman GR, Wainman B.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 23509000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of instructional strategies using cross sections on the recognition of anatomical structures in correlated CT and MR images.
    Khalil MK, Paas F, Johnson TE, Su YK, Payer AF.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2008; 1(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 19177385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Coupled physical and digital cadaver dissection followed by a visual test protocol provides insights into the nature of anatomical knowledge and its evaluation.
    Hisley KC, Anderson LD, Smith SE, Kavic SM, Tracy JK.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2008 Jan; 1(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 19177376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Web-based interactive 3D visualization as a tool for improved anatomy learning.
    Petersson H, Sinkvist D, Wang C, Smedby O.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2009 Jan; 2(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 19363804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Role of a computer-generated three-dimensional laryngeal model in anatomy teaching for advanced learners.
    Tan S, Hu A, Wilson T, Ladak H, Haase P, Fung K.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2012 Apr; 126(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 22075619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Design of interactive and dynamic anatomical visualizations: the implication of cognitive load theory.
    Khalil MK, Paas F, Johnson TE, Payer AF.
    Anat Rec B New Anat; 2005 Sep; 286(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 16177992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Experimental evidence for improved neuroimaging interpretation using three-dimensional graphic models.
    Ruisoto P, Juanes JA, Contador I, Mayoral P, Prats-Galino A.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2012 Sep; 5(3):132-7. PubMed ID: 22434672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of static and dynamic visualization training approaches for users with different spatial abilities.
    Froese ME, Tory M, Evans GW, Shrikhande K.
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2013 Dec; 19(12):2810-7. PubMed ID: 24051848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Interactive and dynamic visualizations in teaching and learning of anatomy: a cognitive load perspective.
    Khalil MK, Paas F, Johnson TE, Payer AF.
    Anat Rec B New Anat; 2005 Sep; 286(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 16177993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Less is more: development and evaluation of an interactive e-atlas to support anatomy learning.
    Guy R, Pisani HR, Rich P, Leahy C, Mandarano G, Molyneux T.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015 Sep; 8(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 24816995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Two-dimensional sectioned images and three-dimensional surface models for learning the anatomy of the female pelvis.
    Shin DS, Jang HG, Hwang SB, Har DH, Moon YL, Chung MS.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013 Sep; 6(5):316-23. PubMed ID: 23463707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Student perceptions of an upper-level, undergraduate human anatomy laboratory course without cadavers.
    Wright SJ.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2012 Sep; 5(3):146-57. PubMed ID: 22362500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Spatial ability and training in virtual neuroanatomy.
    Plumley L, Armstrong R, De Ribaupierre S, Eagleson R.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013 Sep; 184():324-9. PubMed ID: 23400179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The impact of stereoscopic imagery and motion on anatomical structure recognition and visual attention performance.
    Remmele M, Schmidt E, Lingenfelder M, Martens A.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jan; 11(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 28561952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Virtual cerebral ventricular system: an MR-based three-dimensional computer model.
    Adams CM, Wilson TD.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2011 Jan; 4(6):340-7. PubMed ID: 21976457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The use of self-learning modules to facilitate learning of basic science concepts in an integrated medical curriculum.
    Khalil MK, Nelson LD, Kibble JD.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2010 Jan; 3(5):219-26. PubMed ID: 20814914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Are all hands-on activities equally effective? Effect of using plastic models, organ dissections, and virtual dissections on student learning and perceptions.
    Lombardi SA, Hicks RE, Thompson KV, Marbach-Ad G.
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2014 Mar; 38(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 24585474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.