These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

337 related items for PubMed ID: 22232413

  • 1. Enhancement in informational masking.
    Cao X, Richards VM.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Aug; 55(4):1135-47. PubMed ID: 22232413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comodulation detection differences for fixed-frequency and roved-frequency maskers.
    Hall JW, Buss E, Grose JH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Feb; 119(2):1021-8. PubMed ID: 16521764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Across-channel masking and comodulation masking release.
    Moore BC, Glasberg BR, Schooneveldt GP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1683-94. PubMed ID: 2341672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Combination of masking releases for different center frequencies and masker amplitude statistics.
    Epp B, Verhey JL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2479-89. PubMed ID: 19894828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of masker-frequency variability on the detection performance of infants and adults.
    Leibold LJ, Werner LA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):3960-70. PubMed ID: 16838539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Enhancement of increments in spectral amplitude: further evidence for a mechanism based on central adaptation.
    Carcagno S, Semal C, Demany L.
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 787():175-82. PubMed ID: 23716222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evidence that adaptation of suppression cannot account for auditory enhancement or enhanced forward masking.
    Wright BA, McFadden D.
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1992 Jun 29; 336(1278):325-8; discussion 328-9. PubMed ID: 1354371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: evidence for harmonic cancellation.
    Deroche ML, Culling JF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov 29; 130(5):2855-65. PubMed ID: 22087914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Masker-first advantage for cues in informational masking.
    Richards VM, Huang R, Kidd G.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct 29; 116(4 Pt 1):2278-88. PubMed ID: 15532659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Psychometric functions for informational masking.
    Lutfi RA, Kistler DJ, Callahan MR, Wightman FL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Dec 29; 114(6 Pt 1):3273-82. PubMed ID: 14714808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Estimating peripheral gain and compression using fixed-duration masking curves.
    Yasin I, Drga V, Plack CJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun 29; 133(6):4145-55. PubMed ID: 23742366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of signal-temporal uncertainty in children and adults: tone detection in noise or a random-frequency masker.
    Bonino AY, Leibold LJ, Buss E.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec 29; 134(6):4446. PubMed ID: 25669256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cuing effects for informational masking.
    Richards VM, Neff DL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jan 29; 115(1):289-300. PubMed ID: 14759022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Similarity, uncertainty, and masking in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns.
    Kidd G, Mason CR, Arbogast TL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar 29; 111(3):1367-76. PubMed ID: 11931314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep 29; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Narrow noise band detection in a complex masker: masking level difference due to harmonicity.
    Deroche ML, Culling JF.
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec 29; 282(1-2):225-35. PubMed ID: 21820501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Adults, but not children, benefit from a pretrial signal cue in a random-frequency, two-tone masker.
    Bonino AY, Leibold LJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul 29; 138(1):EL8-13. PubMed ID: 26233066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Psychophysical evidence for auditory compression at low characteristic frequencies.
    Plack CJ, Drga V.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar 29; 113(3):1574-86. PubMed ID: 12656392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Sequential grouping modulates the effect of non-simultaneous masking on auditory intensity resolution.
    Oberfeld D, Stahn P.
    PLoS One; 2012 Mar 29; 7(10):e48054. PubMed ID: 23110174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Informational masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners: sensation level and decision weights.
    Alexander JM, Lutfi RA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct 29; 116(4 Pt 1):2234-47. PubMed ID: 15532655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.