These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

324 related items for PubMed ID: 22235792

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study.
    Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME, Hirsch E, Schutyser F, Quirynen M, Jacobs R.
    J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Sep; 34(9):816-21. PubMed ID: 17716317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Accuracy of Implants Placed with Surgical Guides: Thermoplastic Versus 3D Printed.
    Bell CK, Sahl EF, Kim YJ, Rice DD.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018 Sep; 38(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 29240212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. An in vitro comparative evaluation between virtually planned implant positions on interactive implant software versus actual implant positions achieved using sterolithographic open guide system.
    Sharma A, Agarwal SK, Parkash H, Mehra P, Nagpal A.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019 Sep; 30(2):254-260. PubMed ID: 31169159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Evaluation of a Novel Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanner for Bone Density Examinations in Preoperative 3D Reconstructions and Correlation with Primary Implant Stability.
    Sennerby L, Andersson P, Pagliani L, Giani C, Moretti G, Molinari M, Motroni A.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17(5):844-53. PubMed ID: 24373386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.
    Henprasert P, Dawson DV, El-Kerdani T, Song X, Couso-Queiruga E, Holloway JA.
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional and Computer-Assisted Implant Planning and Placement in Partially Edentulous Patients. Part 4: Accuracy of Implant Placement.
    Schneider D, Sancho-Puchades M, Mir-Marí J, Mühlemann S, Jung R, Hämmerle C.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2019 Jul; 39(4):e111-e122. PubMed ID: 31226190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Accuracy of miniscrew surgical guides assessed from cone-beam computed tomography and digital models.
    Bae MJ, Kim JY, Park JT, Cha JY, Kim HJ, Yu HS, Hwang CJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):893-901. PubMed ID: 23726340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice.
    Stefanelli LV, DeGroot BS, Lipton DI, Mandelaris GA.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019 Jun; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Reliability of circumferential bone level assessment around single implants in healed ridges and extraction sockets using cone beam CT.
    Raes F, Renckens L, Aps J, Cosyn J, De Bruyn H.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Oct; 15(5):661-72. PubMed ID: 22008055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Digitally designed surgical guides for placing extraoral implants in the mastoid area.
    Van der Meer WJ, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM, Visser A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Oct; 27(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 22616066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Accuracy of implant position when placed using static computer-assisted implant surgical guides manufactured with two different optical scanning techniques: a randomized clinical trial.
    Kiatkroekkrai P, Takolpuckdee C, Subbalekha K, Mattheos N, Pimkhaokham A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Mar; 49(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 31543382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Aydemir CA, Arısan V.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Mar; 31(3):255-263. PubMed ID: 31829457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Accuracy of different types of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing surgical guides for dental implant placement.
    Geng W, Liu C, Su Y, Li J, Zhou Y.
    Int J Clin Exp Med; 2015 Mar; 8(6):8442-9. PubMed ID: 26309497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Reliability of voxel gray values in cone beam computed tomography for preoperative implant planning assessment.
    Parsa A, Ibrahim N, Hassan B, Motroni A, van der Stelt P, Wismeijer D.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Mar; 27(6):1438-42. PubMed ID: 23189294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study.
    Horwitz J, Zuabi O, Machtei EE.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1156-62. PubMed ID: 19519787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.