These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

210 related items for PubMed ID: 2223682

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Randomised comparison of routine versus highly selective use of Doppler ultrasound in low risk pregnancies.
    Mason GC, Lilford RJ, Porter J, Nelson E, Tyrell S.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Feb; 100(2):130-3. PubMed ID: 8476803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The Doppler assessment in multiple pregnancy randomised controlled trial of ultrasound biometry versus umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound and biometry in twin pregnancy.
    Giles W, Bisits A, O'Callaghan S, Gill A, DAMP Study Group.
    BJOG; 2003 Jun; 110(6):593-7. PubMed ID: 12798478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effect of introduction of umbilical Doppler recordings to obstetric practice.
    Johnstone FD, Prescott R, Hoskins P, Greer IA, McGlew T, Compton M.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Aug; 100(8):733-41. PubMed ID: 8399011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin].
    Bilar M.
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003 Aug; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Screening for fetal well-being in a high-risk pregnant population comparing the nonstress test with umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Williams KP, Farquharson DF, Bebbington M, Dansereau J, Galerneau F, Wilson RD, Shaw D, Kent N.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 May; 188(5):1366-71. PubMed ID: 12748513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Prognostic value of placental ultrasound in pregnancies complicated by absent end-diastolic flow velocity in the umbilical arteries.
    Viero S, Chaddha V, Alkazaleh F, Simchen MJ, Malik A, Kelly E, Windrim R, Kingdom JC.
    Placenta; 2004 May; 25(8-9):735-41. PubMed ID: 15450392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of the fetal assessment score in pregnancies at risk for intrauterine hypoxia.
    Arabin B, Snyjders R, Mohnhaupt A, Ragosch V, Nicolaides K.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 169(3):549-54. PubMed ID: 8372860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The significance of absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery velocity waveforms.
    Rochelson B, Schulman H, Farmakides G, Bracero L, Ducey J, Fleischer A, Penny B, Winter D.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 156(5):1213-8. PubMed ID: 2953244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.