These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

963 related items for PubMed ID: 22245326

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA, Chan RC, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Clark PE, Baumgartner R, Cookson MS.
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Prospective evaluation of short-term impact and recovery of health related quality of life in men undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy.
    Miller J, Smith A, Kouba E, Wallen E, Pruthi RS.
    J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):854-8; discussion 859. PubMed ID: 17631338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
    Rozet F, Jaffe J, Braud G, Harmon J, Cathelineau X, Barret E, Vallancien G.
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
    Nelson B, Kaufman M, Broughton G, Cookson MS, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Baumgartner RG, Smith JA.
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):929-31. PubMed ID: 17296378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival.
    Barocas DA, Salem S, Kordan Y, Herrell SD, Chang SS, Clark PE, Davis R, Baumgartner R, Phillips S, Cookson MS, Smith JA.
    J Urol; 2010 Mar; 183(3):990-6. PubMed ID: 20083261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy.
    Parsons JK, Bennett JL.
    Urology; 2008 Aug; 72(2):412-6. PubMed ID: 18267330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The role of early adopter bias for new technologies in robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
    Tseng TY, Cancel QV, Fesperman SF, Kuebler HR, Sun L, Robertson CN, Polascik TJ, Moul JW, Vieweg J, Albala DM, Dahm P.
    J Urol; 2007 Apr; 177(4):1318-23. PubMed ID: 17382723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Schroeck FR, Sun L, Freedland SJ, Albala DM, Mouraviev V, Polascik TJ, Moul JW.
    BJU Int; 2008 Jul; 102(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 18384634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of 90-day re-admission rates between open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic RP (LRP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).
    Chung SD, Kelle JJ, Huang CY, Chen YH, Lin HC.
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E966-71. PubMed ID: 22540425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
    Trabulsi EJ, Linden RA, Gomella LG, McGinnis DE, Strup SE, Lallas CD.
    Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Urinary and sexual quality of life 1 year following robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Shikanov SA, Eng MK, Bernstein AJ, Katz M, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL, Zorn KC.
    J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):663-7. PubMed ID: 18554650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic.
    Kim SC, Song C, Kim W, Kang T, Park J, Jeong IG, Lee S, Cho YM, Ahn H.
    Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 21612859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
    Ludovico GM, Dachille G, Pagliarulo G, D'Elia C, Mondaini N, Gacci M, Detti B, Malossini G, Bartoletti R, Cai T.
    Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
    Koutlidis N, Mourey E, Champigneulle J, Mangin P, Cormier L.
    Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a review of the current state of affairs.
    Patel VR, Chammas MF, Shah S.
    Int J Clin Pract; 2007 Feb; 61(2):309-14. PubMed ID: 17263718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 49.