These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
139 related items for PubMed ID: 22246928
1. Utility of the Thin Prep Imaging System® in the detection of squamous intraepithelial abnormalities on retrospective evaluation: can we trust the imager? Barroeta JE, Reilly ME, Steinhoff MM, Lawrence WD. Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Feb; 40(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 22246928 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation of the ThinPrep Imaging System in a tertiary military medical center. Duby JM, DiFurio MJ. Cancer; 2009 Aug 25; 117(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 19536887 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Value of computer-assisted slide-screening system in ThinPrep cervical cytology]. Yang J, Tao K, Yang H, Guo ZH, Hu YM, Tan ZY. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Sep 25; 42(9):609-12. PubMed ID: 24314247 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears. Guo M, Hu L, Martin L, Liu S, Baliga M, Hughson MD. Acta Cytol; 2005 Sep 25; 49(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15839615 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation of the ThinPrep imaging system in a high-volume metropolitan laboratory. Miller FS, Nagel LE, Kenny-Moynihan MB. Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Apr 25; 35(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 17351933 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry in Evaluating Negative Cervical Biopsies Following High-risk Pap Test Results. Shain AF, Kwok S, Folkins AK, Kong CS. Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Jan 25; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29112019 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of cervical cytology screening methods and staining protocols for detection rate and accurate interpretation of ASC-H: Data from a high-volume laboratory in Turkey. Ozlem A, Umit I. Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Nov 25; 43(11):863-9. PubMed ID: 26173757 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of an imaging system vs. manual screening in the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix. Dziura B, Quinn S, Richard K. Acta Cytol; 2006 Nov 25; 50(3):309-11. PubMed ID: 16780026 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and tumors using the AutoPap System: results of a primary screening clinical trial. Wilbur DC, Prey MU, Miller WM, Pawlick GF, Colgan TJ, Dax Taylor D. Cancer; 1999 Dec 25; 87(6):354-8. PubMed ID: 10603189 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of computer-assisted and manual screening of cervical cytology. Lozano R. Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jan 25; 104(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 16959306 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: screening and diagnostic errors in Papanicolaou smears. Ruba S, Schoolland M, Allpress S, Sterrett G. Cancer; 2004 Oct 25; 102(5):280-7. PubMed ID: 15376198 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Neural-network-assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in presumed negative cervical cytologic smears. A comparison. Mango LJ, Valente PT. Acta Cytol; 1998 Oct 25; 42(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9479345 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of the ThinPrep Imaging System in the detection of abnormal cervicovaginal cytology: a practical experience in Korea. Ha SY, Lee YK, Oh YL. Acta Cytol; 2013 Oct 25; 57(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 23406895 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. HSIL, epithelial cell abnormality-adjusted workload, and the Thinprep imaging system. Renshaw AA, Elsheikh TM. Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Mar 25; 40(3):201-3. PubMed ID: 22334521 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Introduction of the Thin Prep Imaging System (TIS): experience in a high volume academic practice. Chivukula M, Saad RS, Elishaev E, White S, Mauser N, Dabbs DJ. Cytojournal; 2007 Feb 08; 4():6. PubMed ID: 17288596 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Morphologic analysis of false negative SurePath® slides using Focalpoint™ GS computer-assisted cervical screening technology: An Australian experience. Bowditch RC, Clarke JM, Baird PJ, Greenberg ML. Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Nov 08; 43(11):870-8. PubMed ID: 26174002 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]