These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

391 related items for PubMed ID: 22259795

  • 1. Accuracy of three implant impression techniques with different impression materials and stones.
    Chang WG, Vahidi F, Bae KH, Lim BS.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 22259795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M, Garg P, Prithviraj DR.
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Feng C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ, Owen P, Howes DG.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N, Alikhasi M, Samadizadeh S, Beyabanaki E, Kharazifard MJ.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials.
    Mostafa TM, Elgendy MN, Kashef NA, Halim MM.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010 Apr; 23(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 21209987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
    Forrester-Baker L, Seymour KG, Samarawickrama D, Zou L, Cherukara G, Patel M.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA, Chávez AM, Amaral AL, Compagnoni MA, Mollo Fde A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Jun; 25(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 20657873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
    Lee YJ, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Jun; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Accuracy of impression techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA, Chávez AM, Compagnoni MA, Molo Fde A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Jun; 25(4):715-21. PubMed ID: 20657866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants.
    Daoudi MF, Setchell DJ, Searson LJ.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001 Jun; 14(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11843452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Cehreli MC, Akça K.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of measurement site on the dimensional accuracy of die-forming materials and techniques.
    Petrie CS, Walker MP, Theodotou N, Glaros AG, Williams K.
    Gen Dent; 2004 Feb; 52(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 15206253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S, Varvara G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The influence of five impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of master models.
    Fenske C.
    Braz Dent J; 2000 Apr; 11(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 11210270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC, Grosko ML, Raj M, Ryan TN, Johnston WM.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000 Apr; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A simplified impression technique for dental implants.
    Vogel RE.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Mar; 23(3 Suppl 1):13-6. PubMed ID: 11913312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments.
    Eliasson A, Ortorp A.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e30-8. PubMed ID: 21453396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 1--Influence of transfer copings surface abrasion.
    Assunção WG, Cardoso A, Gomes EA, Tabata LF, dos Santos PH.
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):641-7. PubMed ID: 19090889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.