These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

374 related items for PubMed ID: 22262828

  • 1. Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control.
    Althen H, Wittekindt A, Gaese B, Kössl M, Abel C.
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(7):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22262828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
    Abel C, Wittekindt A, Kössl M.
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
    Abel C, Kössl M.
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice.
    Varghese GI, Zhu X, Frisina RD.
    Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
    Kossowski M, Mom T, Guitton M, Poncet JL, Bonfils P, Avan P.
    Audiology; 2001 Nov; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA, Baranowski LG.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Nov; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Contralateral suppression of latency during distortion product otoacoustic emissions detection in guinea pigs].
    Kong W, Yang Y, Zhang W.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12761994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE, Long KM, Lees SE.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Impact of three hours of discotheque music on pure-tone thresholds and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Müller J, Dietrich S, Janssen T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1853-69. PubMed ID: 20968358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: effect of the primary frequency in Dpgrams.
    Zhang F, Boettcher FA, Sun XM.
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Apr; 46(4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17454232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Changes in amplitude and phase of distortion-product otoacoustic emission fine-structure and separated components during efferent activation.
    Henin S, Thompson S, Abdelrazeq S, Long GR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2068-79. PubMed ID: 21476662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Increased amplitude of distortion product emissions in the human caused by contralateral low intensity acoustic stimulation].
    Nieschalk M, Beneking R, Stoll W.
    HNO; 1997 May; 45(5):378-84. PubMed ID: 9265021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Contralateral acoustic stimulation alters the magnitude and phase of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Deeter R, Abel R, Calandruccio L, Dhar S.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2413-24. PubMed ID: 19894823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
    Bhagat SP, Kilgore C.
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan 24; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on cochlear tuning measured using stimulus frequency and distortion product OAEs.
    Boothalingam S, Lineton B.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Dec 24; 51(12):892-9. PubMed ID: 22934932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips.
    Wagner W, Heppelmann G, Müller J, Janssen T, Zenner HP.
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan 24; 223(1-2):83-92. PubMed ID: 17137736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.