These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

131 related items for PubMed ID: 22267704

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Concepts for differential diagnosis in breast MR imaging.
    Kuhl CK.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2006 Aug; 14(3):305-28, v. PubMed ID: 17098173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge by magnetic resonance mammography based on breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging descriptors.
    Tokuda Y, Kuriyama K, Nakamoto A, Choi S, Yutani K, Kunitomi Y, Haneda T, Kawai M, Masuda N, Takeda M, Nakamura H.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009 Aug; 33(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 19188786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer.
    Riedl CC, Ponhold L, Flöry D, Weber M, Kroiss R, Wagner T, Fuchsjäger M, Helbich TH.
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Oct 15; 13(20):6144-52. PubMed ID: 17947480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
    Hauth EA, Stockamp C, Maderwald S, Mühler A, Kimmig R, Jaeger H, Barkhausen J, Forsting M.
    Clin Imaging; 2006 Oct 15; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Technical aspects of breast magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hylton NM, Kinkel K.
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1998 Feb 15; 9(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9617899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. [MR mammography: current status and indications].
    Umschaden HW, Haselbach H.
    Acta Med Austriaca; 1997 Feb 15; 24(2):39-45. PubMed ID: 9273806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [MR mammography at 0.5 tesla. I. Comparison of image quality and sensitivity of MR mammography at 0.5 and 1.5 T].
    Kuhl CK, Kreft BP, Hauswirth A, Elevelt A, Steudel A, Reiser M, Schild HH.
    Rofo; 1995 May 15; 162(5):381-9. PubMed ID: 7772759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [Dynamic MR mammography: is the course of signal intensification suitable for the differentiation of different forms of mastopathy?].
    Sittek H, Kessler M, Heuck AF, Lebeau A, Kohnert M, Untch M, Bohmert H, Reiser M.
    Rofo; 1996 Jul 15; 165(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 8765364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Review of MR mammography techniques.
    Bosmans H, Van Ongeval C, Vandenbosch G, Van Steen A, Marchal G.
    JBR-BTR; 2000 Jun 15; 83(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 11025924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. [MR-mammography: current status and perspectives].
    Funke M, Fischer U, Grabbe E.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 May 15; 6(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 8679736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Magnetization transfer in magnetic resonance imaging.
    Thomas JD.
    Radiol Technol; 1996 May 15; 67(4):297-306. PubMed ID: 8778909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.