These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

261 related items for PubMed ID: 22268913

  • 1. Semantics boosts syntax in artificial grammar learning tasks with recursion.
    Fedor A, Varga M, Szathmáry E.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):776-82. PubMed ID: 22268913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Syntactic structure and artificial grammar learning: the learnability of embedded hierarchical structures.
    de Vries MH, Monaghan P, Knecht S, Zwitserlood P.
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):763-74. PubMed ID: 17963740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Semantics of the transitive construction: prototype effects and developmental comparisons.
    Ibbotson P, Theakston AL, Lieven EV, Tomasello M.
    Cogn Sci; 2012 May; 36(7):1268-88. PubMed ID: 22591052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Goal relevance and artificial grammar learning.
    Eitam B, Schul Y, Hassin RR.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):228-38. PubMed ID: 19058050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Neural network processing of natural language: II. Towards a unified model of corticostriatal function in learning sentence comprehension and non-linguistic sequencing.
    Dominey PF, Inui T, Hoen M.
    Brain Lang; 2009 Feb; 109(2-3):80-92. PubMed ID: 18835637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The logical syntax of number words: theory, acquisition and processing.
    Musolino J.
    Cognition; 2009 Apr; 111(1):24-45. PubMed ID: 19217616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. What is learned about fragments in artificial grammar learning? A transitional probabilities approach.
    Poletiek FH, Wolters G.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):868-76. PubMed ID: 19065286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Primitive computations in speech processing.
    Endress AD, Mehler J.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2187-209. PubMed ID: 19418378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Individual strategies in artificial grammar learning.
    Visser I, Raijmakers ME, Pothos EM.
    Am J Psychol; 2009 Nov; 122(3):293-307. PubMed ID: 19827700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Adults' acquisition of novel dimension words: creating a semantic congruity effect.
    Ryalls BO, Smith LB.
    J Gen Psychol; 2000 Jul; 127(3):279-326. PubMed ID: 10975427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Transfer in artificial grammar learning: the role of repetition information.
    Lotz A, Kinder A.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):707-15. PubMed ID: 16822142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Are there qualitative differences in the representation of abstract and concrete words? Within-language and cross-language evidence from the semantic priming paradigm.
    Ferré P, Guasch M, García-Chico T, Sánchez-Casas R.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015 Jul; 68(12):2402-18. PubMed ID: 25671701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Granularity and the acquisition of grammatical gender: how order-of-acquisition affects what gets learned.
    Arnon I, Ramscar M.
    Cognition; 2012 Mar; 122(3):292-305. PubMed ID: 22169657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The conscious, the unconscious, and familiarity.
    Scott RB, Dienes Z.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1264-88. PubMed ID: 18763904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Abstract structural representations of goal-directed behavior.
    Allen K, Ibara S, Seymour A, Cordova N, Botvinick M.
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Oct; 21(10):1518-24. PubMed ID: 20855906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug 15; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Strengthening the case for stimulus-specificity in artificial grammar learning: no evidence for abstract representations with extended exposure.
    Johansson T.
    Exp Psychol; 2009 Aug 15; 56(3):188-97. PubMed ID: 19289361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Semantic involvement in reading aloud: evidence from a nonword training study.
    McKay A, Davis C, Savage G, Castles A.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov 15; 34(6):1495-517. PubMed ID: 18980410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.